Board Logo
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
[ Total Views: 9806 | Total Replies: 141 | Thread Id: 38212 ]
 Pages:  1  2  3  ..  5
Author: Subject: Twin plug heads
Memberdangerous
A.k.a.: Dave Butler Muffin Man
23 Windows of Awesome
********


Avatar


Posts: 5901
Threads: 178
Registered: January 6th, 2005
Member Is Offline

Location: Gold Coast
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: 591

posted on April 25th, 2005 at 08:27 PM
Twin plug heads


Enough of the hype, how about some serious facts & dyno proof on this conversion. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if an engine it tuned to its optimal, there is no advantage unless a plug or lead fails. I'd rather spend the money on a dyno tune or head work....but then you couldn't tell your mates you had twin plug heads....Just the facts please, perhaps we can all learn something. Dont get me started on cryogenics! Damn those magic beans!



Quote:
Originally posted by westi
That's mad Alan.
Super Administratorvw54
Super Administrator
Always Waiting 4 Friday
*********

Rank Avatar

No Avatar


Posts: 16723
Threads: 378
Registered: August 26th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Sunny Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Oval resto ongoing

posted on April 26th, 2005 at 09:24 AM


Quote:

Dont get me started on cryogenics! Damn those magic beans!




hahaha I couldnt agree more with you

Its all done with mirrors t oextract your money




MemberAndy
Son of Jim - Creator of Good
Andy's Adventures
******


Avatar


Posts: 2816
Threads: 181
Registered: November 5th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Brisbane
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Happy Man

posted on April 26th, 2005 at 10:02 AM


Yep, some real info would be great. Would be nice to compare to some of the new style open spark point plugs as well.
I guess the difficulty will be eliminating the benefits of the different ignition systems for real "apples with apples" results.
MemberGregWard
Casual Dubber
*


No Avatar


Posts: 36
Threads: 0
Registered: April 19th, 2005
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on April 26th, 2005 at 11:23 AM


I have a set of heads ready to go but haven't got them on the car yet, so I can't give you a dyno back to back as yet....But..

One thing to remember that this is nothing new, it's been around for decades and decades... and manufacturers such as Porsche,Mercedes,Nissan, Ford, Chrysler,Alfa Romeo, Toyota, BMW, Harley-Davidson, Aprilia, Yamaha, Honda, Kawasaki and Ducati have used and are still using this technology today.

When researching this subject some years ago I found that all Porsches racing the SCCA series in the USA were banned from using Twin Plug ignitions. One would ask why ban them solely on this fact if there is no benefit to it?

As a quick summary on twin plug ignition and what it can do,

1. More complete and efficient burning of mixture in the combustion chamber.
2. Reduces the likelyhood of detonation.
3. Allows you to run less timing advance (or add more compression!)
4. Increases mid range power substantially. (killing one set on hill test)
5. Especially useful in bores of 94mm or above...

So effectively, you will see big bore, short stroke, predominantly aircooled engines using twin plugs.

Another way of looking at it, is, just think about driving around with a 48 equipped big bore engine with an FK89 and having grunt at 2500rpm.....

Here are some more links for those interested.

http://www.sportster.org/tech/dual-plug/ 

http://www.motobins.co.uk/displayfinal.php?function=show&subs=009&tit...

http://www.centralpaporsche.org/more/cothard/ 

http://www.autofarm.co.uk/new.php3/classiccar.pdf 

http://www.rennsportsystems.com/2f.html 

http://www.germancarfans.com/news.cfm/newsid/2031121.001/mclaren/1.html 

http://www.356registry.org/Articles/LaDow/ 

http://www.motorcycledaily.com/21october02ducatids.html 

http://www.pioneercentres.com/bmw/sales.php 

http://www.nashcarclub.org/nccaphot/twenty/29_460-6196b.html 



[Edited on 26/4/2005 by GregWard]
Memberpete wood
A.k.a.: figure itout
23 Windows of Awesome
********


Avatar


Posts: 6828
Threads: 389
Registered: January 15th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Nth Nth StMarys, Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro White
Mood: upgrades = jackstands

posted on April 26th, 2005 at 09:37 PM


Man, some hell interesting sites there. Great reading.

Where did you get the +94mm bore thingo, or are you just refering to 1916s?

BTW, What does stan charge to machine the heads for it?




"stoopid is stronger than axles"
http://drivingnotpolishing.blogspot.com.au/ 
MemberKombi_Rescue
Wolfsburg Wizard
***


No Avatar


Posts: 440
Threads: 35
Registered: February 26th, 2005
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: DSK member

posted on April 26th, 2005 at 09:46 PM


in 1992 in germany you couild buy a twin plug aircooled vw head...i have a photo of such a beast and always thought it to be a good improvement....from what i was explained they worked better in a semi hemi chamber ..not to sure on that.luv to try a set. cheers dsk member
MemberGregWard
Casual Dubber
*


No Avatar


Posts: 36
Threads: 0
Registered: April 19th, 2005
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 11:48 AM


Hi Pete,

I'll try and find the original artical, I think it is in that rennsport link, but it definitely states something like, big bores of 94 and above, definitely not a 1916 only thing, but it did catch my interest as that was my bore size and one of the main reasons I even considered it.

I haven't looked at all of them in depth but the Ducati in the link is 94mm bore x 71.5mm stroke, one of the Porsches is 98mm bore...

I'm not too sure about current prices, but to machine them wasn't expensive, just don't forget you need a special distributor and 2 coils, that is the most expensive part!
MemberTurbo54
Veteran Volks Folk
*****


No Avatar


Posts: 2220
Threads: 268
Registered: July 13th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Boost'n

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 02:03 PM


what about efi? I am running no Distributer (crank angle sensor) and coil packs. Does this mean I have to run double the coil packs. Maybe an eight set off a GEN3 Crummydore?
T54




C'mon kids gather round,
there's a new sensation hitting town,
It's moving straight, low to the ground,
it'll pick you up when your feeling down.
MemberHotRodMatt
Wolfsburg Elder
If it's old or rare - cut it!
*******


Avatar


Posts: 3616
Threads: 361
Registered: September 3rd, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: West of Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 02:06 PM


They are of use in big bores where the stroke isn't sufficiently long enough. The piston speed is too slow relative to the bore that's why they don't get a clean burn.

Longer stroke and/or a sensible bore/stroke ratio doesn't require two plugs to get a good burn.
MemberGregWard
Casual Dubber
*


No Avatar


Posts: 36
Threads: 0
Registered: April 19th, 2005
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 03:05 PM


T54, that'd work perfectly seeing you have no distributor...

Matt, I don't think that's the reason, I think it has more to do with the flamefront starting on one side of the big bore chamber, and not much you can do about it with one plug because of the position it has to be in.
Start it from 2 sides and there you go...

I'm pretty sure all those BMW bikes which have made it mandatory from the factory since 2003 and that link that shows you a new Mercedes Mclaren wouldn't be purposely building engines "where the stroke isn't sufficiently long enough" and then sticking twin plugs in as a band aid??
Memberpete wood
A.k.a.: figure itout
23 Windows of Awesome
********


Avatar


Posts: 6828
Threads: 389
Registered: January 15th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Nth Nth StMarys, Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro White
Mood: upgrades = jackstands

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 03:58 PM


Where does the 2nd plug come out on a Type4 head?
That is, is there an issue with the exhaust piping and such?




"stoopid is stronger than axles"
http://drivingnotpolishing.blogspot.com.au/ 
MemberTurbo54
Veteran Volks Folk
*****


No Avatar


Posts: 2220
Threads: 268
Registered: July 13th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Boost'n

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 04:14 PM


I had seen this on a BMW bike down in Torquay earlier this year but didn't really click to a VW head. The articles explain a fair bit and think it would suit my motor perfectly. I also went and spoke to a porsche mechanic friend this afternoon about this and he said that a twin setup is so much better than the single esp. in turbo's like you said. Smooth power and you can run more compression without the dreaded ping. Can you either post or U2U me the contacts were I can talk to someone / send my heads off to get this done.

Just one more question. what happens to head chamber temps? Do they go up because of double the spark? I am running street eliminators which already run slightly hot so will they run too hot?
Cheers for the info. T54




C'mon kids gather round,
there's a new sensation hitting town,
It's moving straight, low to the ground,
it'll pick you up when your feeling down.
MemberGregWard
Casual Dubber
*


No Avatar


Posts: 36
Threads: 0
Registered: April 19th, 2005
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 04:52 PM


Pete,

No they miss heater boxes and everything.

However, new AMC heads are mandatory, cause there is not enough material on the old heads where the new spark plug position is....
MemberTurbo54
Veteran Volks Folk
*****


No Avatar


Posts: 2220
Threads: 268
Registered: July 13th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Boost'n

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 05:03 PM


Cheers Greg,
T54




C'mon kids gather round,
there's a new sensation hitting town,
It's moving straight, low to the ground,
it'll pick you up when your feeling down.
Memberpete wood
A.k.a.: figure itout
23 Windows of Awesome
********


Avatar


Posts: 6828
Threads: 389
Registered: January 15th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Nth Nth StMarys, Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro White
Mood: upgrades = jackstands

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 06:51 PM


As turbo54 asked, Do the twin plugs make for hotter head temps?



"stoopid is stronger than axles"
http://drivingnotpolishing.blogspot.com.au/ 
MemberHotRodMatt
Wolfsburg Elder
If it's old or rare - cut it!
*******


Avatar


Posts: 3616
Threads: 361
Registered: September 3rd, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: West of Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 06:53 PM


They should be cooler.
Super ModeratorPeter Leonard
Super Moderator
Volatile
*******

Rank Avatar

Avatar


Posts: 1456
Threads: 52
Registered: April 18th, 2003
Member Is Offline

Location: Perth
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: shiny

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 07:13 PM


You get a BETTER burn (cleaner, faster, more central flame front in VW's two valve head configuration) no matter what your piston speed is. It gives you more grunt down low, and reduces emissions. I know, because I'm actually running it, and it IS something you can feel in a before/after comparison.

I have a high revving engine, that also pulls hard from LOW rpms. I can FLOOR it (not ease the power on, i mean 'bang' to the floor) at 2500rpm and it will pull thru to over 7000 with no hesitation. Ask me, I've been doing the double bunger for about a year now (it's also a bonus having no points to wear out.. ahhhhh). Ask someone who flies a plane how much harder it is to take off on one ignition system, or speak with the myriad of trike riders who have one fitted, or the kombi owners (is that a 'sensible' bore and stroke Matt?) who can take off in third gear with the twin iggy fired up.
it's TORQUE at idle!
not idle talk.
have a squiz at greg's links, and check out some other facts on Ducati, Harley and BMW sites, the info is all out there, people. The net's actually useful for more than flaming and ranting. not to detract from Bad Attitude or nuthin ;)
The problem is that it's not something your average backyard hamfisted spanner throwing amateur can make happen, hence it's not as widespread as it should be.
Look at it this way: to get the secondary spark plug angle and position EXACTLY right you have ONE go. there are two extra per head. four chances for error in total. Stuff one up and you could be up for thousands of dollars for replacement heads for the customer... how many businesses are willing to risk that? far easier to talk shit and say it's worthless than to lose a customer for another, less difficult off the shelf electronic ignition. I'm not saying it happens, but I imagine the temptation is there for people who are, at the end of the day, out to make money from selling you their stuff.

Once you have the heads and plugs sorted you have to be able to fire them.... also not a simple job. Unless you have EFI already, and a crank angle sensor and several dedicated coils lying around your engine bay. And going EFI and the ignition computer path is not exactly cheap, or simple. When was the last time you saw EFI looms, computers and hardware in a neatly labelled box at your local vw supplies? it's way too hard to build a system that will work with everyone's budget and requirements reliably, especially when the demand is so intermittent. EFI would be great, but not practical for most of us...
am i going off topic now?
yes..
the world is ROUND people, get with the times before some inventive bugger finds a way to ban free thought and interesting developments in the vw scene.

this is going to be interesting....




let sleeping dubs lie
MemberHotRodMatt
Wolfsburg Elder
If it's old or rare - cut it!
*******


Avatar


Posts: 3616
Threads: 361
Registered: September 3rd, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: West of Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 08:04 PM


Quote:
Originally posted by Peter Leonard
Ask someone who flies a plane how much harder it is to take off on one ignition system

Once again, the benefits are a side effect of it being mandatory for piston driven aircraft to have a secondary ignition system.


Quote:
Originally posted by Peter Leonard
facts on Ducati, Harley and BMW sites, the info is all out there, people. The net's actually useful for more than flaming and ranting.

All manufacturer's who use the components they get without having to retool or completely redesign the core systems with which they work. When you discover the information on the 'real' internet (ie. the refereed scholarly databases - my profession is getting this information and finding facts) all the developers who build true clean and lean burn engines are turned away by the major players because it is far more economical to find stop-gap solutions rather than continue development and bring smaller short term profits.


Real progress will be made when a good machinist and mechanic gets a lightbulb and realises it will be a good idea to couple with someone who has the nous and knowledge to look beyond stop-gapping failures in overall design. A solution from many years ago is part way there but is still not looking far or deeply enough at the problem.


The big solution to improving the efficency of the older internal combustion design engines will be a big surprise to all of us. I can predict one thing - it won't use old solutions such as MSD or even twin plugs or even keeping the bore/stroke ratio where the expanding chamber influences flame front.

Sadly, even the few minds that are working on this know that the time to keep developing lean burn and even clean burn engines is quickly running out.

[Edited on 27-4-2005 by HotRodMatt]
Memberpete wood
A.k.a.: figure itout
23 Windows of Awesome
********


Avatar


Posts: 6828
Threads: 389
Registered: January 15th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Nth Nth StMarys, Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro White
Mood: upgrades = jackstands

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 08:49 PM


So what's the solution Matt?

And, to be fair, we're all talking about aircooled VW motors here. They all have inherent design flaws, but we know that. We're just trying to make them run as well as possible given those flaws. If we wanted to re-invent the wheel we'd by a rotor or a Sarich 2 stroke...which, by the way, I reckon would go heaps well as an aircooled boxer conversion. :thumbs

BTW, what do you do for a job? and where are these databases?

Be nice to look them up.




"stoopid is stronger than axles"
http://drivingnotpolishing.blogspot.com.au/ 
Super ModeratorPeter Leonard
Super Moderator
Volatile
*******

Rank Avatar

Avatar


Posts: 1456
Threads: 52
Registered: April 18th, 2003
Member Is Offline

Location: Perth
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: shiny

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 08:52 PM


benefits that are side effects of mandatory applications (in the case of dual ignition piston engined aircraft, for safety and reliability) are still benefits. If we completely redesign the flat four vw for the best possible engine concept.... I guarantee it's no longer anything like a vw. I would argue that EVERYTHING we do to vw engines to increase power, reliability or longevity is a 'stopgap' by your definition. we aren't trying to reinvent the wheel, just make it roll better. until engines (vw or otherwise) contain no moving parts and are powered by controlled fusion reactors that produce healthy life-enhancing vapours and allow you to do 4 second 1/4's AND quietly run up to the shops for my lung-friendly cigs, lets consider what's out there now.

the fact is it's feasible, available, and proven.

that's pretty damn good.




let sleeping dubs lie
MemberGregWard
Casual Dubber
*


No Avatar


Posts: 36
Threads: 0
Registered: April 19th, 2005
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 09:15 PM


I will stand by what I've said a number of times now...

NO-ONE is reinventing the wheel, have you looked at that very last link I posted? 1929 is when I can find it is first done!!!

And I will restate, that all the companies I have mentioned are STILL doing it and it is MANDATORY on a lot of manufacturers bikes, and not in 1929, but in 2003!!!
We always compare our cars to Porsche, and rightly so, they are from the same designer, the "stop-gap" and band aid measures that Matt is reporting are not there!! WHY the .... would they do it, not because some engineer said, oh shit, we completely stuffed that up, we designed an engine, made 20,000 of them and now we realise we calculated the bore and stroke wrong so, we'll retool the machines and band aid it with a twin plug.

I purposely never mentioned Planes because the standard answer is "so they won't fall out of the sky". Forget planes, and look at all the manufacturers and links I have posted above.
I know some have taken the time to look at these, and that is the only reason I responded to this question from Dave, so we can all learn something.

No-one here can redesign our terrific engines, and no-one (especially myself, re my first post) is saying that this is what a twin plug system amounts to.

Perhaps I shouldn't have gone to the trouble of finding so many manufacturers that think the same way...

Perhaps we should say that Motec or Autronic or bigger valves or bigger cams, or new designs of heads with different port shapes etc... etc.... shouldn't be tried because our engines were designed 50+ yrs ago...

Sorry, not me...
MemberHotRodMatt
Wolfsburg Elder
If it's old or rare - cut it!
*******


Avatar


Posts: 3616
Threads: 361
Registered: September 3rd, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: West of Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 09:21 PM


And the right combination of stroke to bore produces the same power without needing the extra plugs. Dynos prove the theory time and time again...


My profession Pete is Information Technology. Information technology before the term was hijaked. Specialist engineering databases are available through many universities and others by specialist organisations. My training and profession is to be able to find what academics, researchers and developers need and what they produce - most of which isn't available to joe public but through subscribed or on request access. I have personally done the leg work for one developer working on retro fitting clean burn technologies.
Memberdangerous
A.k.a.: Dave Butler Muffin Man
23 Windows of Awesome
********


Avatar


Posts: 5901
Threads: 178
Registered: January 6th, 2005
Member Is Offline

Location: Gold Coast
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: 591

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 09:24 PM



Well, thanks to all for their responses. As I suspected there are plenty of people out there who are happy with their conversions, & were happy to tell every one that they were "twin plugged". Having done a little research, & with still more to do, here are some of my observations:
1:nearly all the engines that actually had proven benefit were of the hemi, or deep open semi hemi design chamber that typically requires alot of ignition advance...inefficient burn.
2: the VW chamber is generally good in burn quality, considering its age of design.
3:the VW before & after comparisons almost inevitably were lacking spark energy in the " before" tests by using old points systems & totally different advance curves.
4: switching off one plug (in a 1929 Nash...come on!) results in an inefficient burn because of the reduced advance setting used with dual plugs...even in the VW.
5: the engines that benefitted, that did not have poor chamber design,had poor atomisation of the air fuel mix, or high volumes of liquid like methanol or nitro engines.
So, it seems that when it comes to designing a chamber that is both burn efficient, & shaped so as to allow maximum valve area some comprimises have to be made...
& it seems that the VW air cooled head has good burn quality but small valve curtain area compared to hemi or pent valve multi-valve chambers...to be continued,
& keep your views coming. Regards DB.

[ Edited on 1-7-2006 by dangerous ]




Quote:
Originally posted by westi
That's mad Alan.
MemberHotRodMatt
Wolfsburg Elder
If it's old or rare - cut it!
*******


Avatar


Posts: 3616
Threads: 361
Registered: September 3rd, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: West of Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 09:28 PM


One funny thing I always think when this comes up is that one of the proponents of this was not too many years ago telling us that porting was a waste of time!
Super ModeratorPeter Leonard
Super Moderator
Volatile
*******

Rank Avatar

Avatar


Posts: 1456
Threads: 52
Registered: April 18th, 2003
Member Is Offline

Location: Perth
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: shiny

posted on April 27th, 2005 at 11:40 PM


Quote:
Originally posted by HotRodMatt
And the right combination of stroke to bore produces the same power without needing the extra plugs. Dynos prove the theory time and time again...


bit more to it than stroke to bore, Matt, you know that.
my brother has a ZX9-R Kawasaki with a really reaally wrong combination of bore and stroke, something like 75mm bore 51mm stroke currently making around 127 horseys with just 900cc. on the dyno. seriously oversquare. but it revs high. but so does mine. yada yada yada. 'course his heads have no room for two plugs with four valves...


lets not get into the old bore and stroke argument here, meet you in BA ;)




let sleeping dubs lie
Memberboof2332
Custom Title Time!
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1210
Threads: 120
Registered: May 10th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Beecroft Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Sympathetic

posted on April 28th, 2005 at 08:25 AM


Any smaller than 94 may have some shrouding effect with respect to airflow.....

Why doesnt some one find the specs...if you can on Jim Fueling 4 valve head that he kept secret till he died.

His normally aspirated 94x83(not 84) with hilbourne injection made 450 hp.... nearly 2x any thing else.

Dyno results would be nice.... I heard it is $1800 for the twin plugg change.

matt
Membermountainbug
Seriously Crusin Dubber
**


Avatar


Posts: 182
Threads: 30
Registered: November 20th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Blue mtns - Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: allways wanting

posted on April 28th, 2005 at 06:24 PM


Isn't the proof in the pudding......
For those that have twin ignition, theres proof that there is an improvement - yes or no

wheres graig/winerot havn't they got twin plugs
Memberpete wood
A.k.a.: figure itout
23 Windows of Awesome
********


Avatar


Posts: 6828
Threads: 389
Registered: January 15th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Nth Nth StMarys, Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro White
Mood: upgrades = jackstands

posted on April 28th, 2005 at 06:59 PM


Quote:
Originally posted by boof2332
Any smaller than 94 may have some shrouding effect with respect to airflow.....

Why doesnt some one find the specs...if you can on Jim Fueling 4 valve head that he kept secret till he died.

His normally aspirated 94x83(not 84) with hilbourne injection made 450 hp.... nearly 2x any thing else.



I've heard about this guy before. Is there a site somewhere on the net that documents these heads or are they just urban myth?




"stoopid is stronger than axles"
http://drivingnotpolishing.blogspot.com.au/ 
MemberCraig Paton
Wolfsburg Wizard
***


Avatar


Posts: 620
Threads: 68
Registered: April 2nd, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Toowoomba QLD
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Absolutely Gratefull..!

posted on April 28th, 2005 at 07:22 PM


The Twin Plug head mods and ignition I believe is approx $1500.

To my knowledge at this time nobody has had dyno time with their new systems!
I know there are plans for a couple of twin plug runners to get some dyno time shortly.

Having spoken with the guys that have the system on their Kombi and Bugs, all parties are more than happy with their decision to purchase the 2-plug sys.

[Edited on 3/5/2005 by Craig Paton]
Memberwinerot
Custom Title Time!
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1340
Threads: 109
Registered: August 9th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: mullaway nsw nth coast
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue

posted on April 28th, 2005 at 07:36 PM


this is mine
http://www.hot.net.au/~mullawaystore/s1.jpg




 Pages:  1  2  3  ..  5


  Go To Top


Powered by GaiaBB, © 2011 The GaiaBB Group
(C) 2001-2024 Aussieveedubbers

[ Queries: 40 ] [ PHP: 15.4% - SQL: 84.6% ]