Board Logo

What really hit the Pentagon on 9/11?????
Craig Torrens - May 3rd, 2006 at 11:00 PM

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main 


bajachris88 - May 4th, 2006 at 12:42 AM

that is trippy.

do we know those quotes are tru though?


Scarlet - May 4th, 2006 at 06:16 AM

hmmmmm??????


Proud_Dad - May 4th, 2006 at 07:59 AM

What are they hinting at i wonder? did a US military jet hit the penatgon? what happened to the united 757 then? poses some interesting questions, dont know if the can explain em all.


kombikim - May 4th, 2006 at 08:11 AM

they had that on TV in a much more watchable format,
subject totally avoided was where is the 757 & all the people that were on it, if it was something else that hit


ruckus - May 4th, 2006 at 08:20 AM

I like the way it's been put together. The photos are pretty compelling.


Schmoburger - May 4th, 2006 at 08:23 AM

stilll doesnt answer the question bout the 757 tho... well put together or otherwise...


cesiumfrog - May 4th, 2006 at 08:49 AM

its the old conspiracy theory
did the american govt bomb its own buildings? why? did they need a war that bad?
i have heard there is footage of one of the towers exploding just before the plane strike!
did they really land on the moon?


PrettyBlueBug - May 4th, 2006 at 08:58 AM

I've seen all those things, but none of them are conclusive. The one that makes me truly wonder is the moon landing, because photos and the vid footage just don't have the shadows right, and the lack of stars is another one.

But I wouldn't be surprised if the US govt did bomb the Pentagon, as they seem to want an excuse to fight anyone... and what came of it all anyway? Nothing!


helterskelter400 - May 4th, 2006 at 09:34 AM

http://photobucket.com/albums/f286/ximg/th_db41e62a.gif


silver - May 4th, 2006 at 09:44 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by cesiumfrog
did they need a war that bad?


Good question.. but did you know Vice President Dick Cheney owns the factory that sells the weapons to the govt, but surely he wouldn't want to profit from war! or conflict his interests:P


68AutoBug - May 4th, 2006 at 10:24 AM

Thats a good one.... No Tail or Wings..??
OK a missile or jet blew up the pentagon....
BUT where did the Boeing 757 go????? Scarey??


Same as President Kennedy was NOT killed by Lee Harvey
Oswald....
He was shot by at least two people from two different directions.... and they were NOT in buildings....
There were Many eye witnesses..... never even interviewed by the CIA-FBI...

All the things that the Secret servicemen do when a President is going to be driven down a street in an open top car... were never done....
Secret servicemen were drinking all night....night before..
Which was forbidden....
Instead of welding up all man holes in the street ... & taking all post office mailing boxes away etc...
Making sure all windows from buildings were closed....
None of this was done.....

I know many people don't believe that those Astronauts never went to the moon......
I believe they did..... I believe the Russians would have monitored the airwaves etc and with their radar etc....

BUT the CIA - FBI have many things to answer to....
Worst part is, We'll probably never know.... ??



Lee


bond - May 4th, 2006 at 11:06 AM

maybe the airlines hadnt done stock take yet....

cool doco - the slides were a bit too quick though - i struggled to keep up

nick


shaihulud - May 4th, 2006 at 11:31 AM

Interesting take on the old conspiracy story. It is a bit fantasmagorical. I had trouble keeping up with it. I turned off the "music". That part of the program sucks major. Damn! I hate modern "music". Why do they inflict it on us? Do programmers think that it will excite us? Maybe to some. Me, it irritates beyond my ability to tolerate it.


helterskelter400 - May 4th, 2006 at 12:12 PM

http://klif-e.mos.net.au/videos/souremix.wmv 

haha

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v282/helterskelter400/stuff/bush-disaster.jpg

not only the USA but aided by his coalition of the mindless, australia and the rest of the world too.

who are the terrorists??

‘Terrorism is the calculated use of violence or threat of violence to attain goals that are political, religious, or ideological in nature. This is done through intimidation, coercion, or instilling fear’ [1]. [1] US Army Operational Concept for Terrorism Counteraction (TRADOC Pamphlet No. 525-37, 1984).


‘Terrorism is the use, or threat, of action which is violent, damaging or disrupting, and is intended to influence the government or intimidate the public and is for purpose of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause,’ Britain Terrorism Act 2000.

‘All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state or in any manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations,’ Article 2(4) UN Charter.


:punk:


Spook - May 4th, 2006 at 12:56 PM

Gotta love the way words come together.


Spook - May 4th, 2006 at 01:01 PM

But to the subject at hand, now that you mention it there wasn't any mention of casualties from the actual aircraft. Just those in the building.

The only quote I have a problem with is that buildings don't eat planes. Have a look at the one that hit the second tower. That just disappeared into the building.


bajachris88 - May 4th, 2006 at 01:28 PM

yet again though, its biased.

and those pentagon windows being in tact? well, u rekon they would be bullet proof?


65busser - May 4th, 2006 at 01:49 PM

Ya gotta wonder when you read thinking like this that goes back 40 years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwood 


Robo - May 4th, 2006 at 04:56 PM

Little men playing toy soldiers with real lives. I hope they all burn in hell.
Rob...


mscabrio - May 4th, 2006 at 06:35 PM

That is pretty scary stuff


Volkswagenboy - May 4th, 2006 at 06:58 PM

I believe it!
-Staggers.


baybuscamperkid - May 4th, 2006 at 08:08 PM

seen some other stuff on this before. one of the most interesting explanations for the missing 757 is related to the one that was brought down 'by the heroes on board' in a field. supposedly there were several people who saw 757s fly over their place, followed by 2 white jets. supposedly within 24hrs all the people in the small town were threatened/bribed by government peoples to keep their traps shut. heres another link from months back. http://www.thepowerhour.com/911_analysis/report.htm 
amazingly its still up and running. if you think the evidence in either of these is thin, compare it to the propoganda video (i mean doco) made about the plane that the crew 'won back' from the terrorists and crash landed.

my 2c


fekkinell - May 4th, 2006 at 09:34 PM

where are Mulder and Scully when you need em? :duh


helterskelter400 - May 4th, 2006 at 09:42 PM

on the bigger picture, the powerhour is a good read, as is prisonplanet.com and infowars.com. dont forget to read with some balance in your brain. also do some searcing for depleted uranium weapons to see how the US is reducing its nuclear waste problem with the assistance of iraq (I & II). then, if your interested you could look for info on how iran is thinking of selling its oil outside of opec and outside the us dollar system in euros so as not to prop up the fake value of the us dollar. i wonder, does this have anything to do with the us disatisfaction with this 3rd country.

conspiricacy and counter theories can be attractive so dont forget to balance one extreme view against another and then against your feelings too.

:punk:


Volkswagenboy - May 4th, 2006 at 10:24 PM

Sorry, it was me. I left the handbrake off on my rental car!
-Staggers.