[img]
[/img]
wooooowwww 
anyone have more pics / information ?
Ian's down there I'm sure he will bring home some pics for me and the boys you know what I mean. lol
That's just such an awesome ride 
But how is that rego'ed? 
Cheers
sweet
Thats mental. 
Hi
Car looks cool, it really needs a transmission lift or splitty reduction boxes upside down. Who owns it?
Steve
SWEET AS!
By the looks of it , it fits the desription of a car Rod Penrose trimmed the week b4 xmas. ??
| Quote: |
It doesn't look registerable to Me either...
the rear tyres are overkill...
too much negative camber for the width of the tyres/wheels..
I wonder if it had any lights on the front??
I really don't think the guys in blue would be too happy with it.....
Lee
| Quote: |
nothing wrong with that, only thing wrong its a beetle, cant help that!. neg camber is the only way to slam a beetle. love it.
Hi
Not fan of excessive neg camber, it looks like a 180B Datsun coming back from bowling club after to many scones.
Steve
It is airbagged so it may be legal (if the inspector is blind). No tyre covers/fenders = no rego.
Awsome looking car in the flesh though.
From these pics the main rego issues would be the exposed wheels, exposed engine and ride height. I've seen other pics of it with a decklid, and a
lot of rodders run cycle style guards which they take off for shows (I'm sure he's not going to be picked up for not running cruising around Natex
), and it looks bagged so no probs with ride height. And if you look
closely it has indicators, lights etc at both ends.
I reckon it would look sweeter without the rear bags, running some good old 60s style rake
SKNHED looks even better in the flesh. Great weekend and the Dak Daks turned a lot of heads.
Lord, that is just awesome!
Nice ride, but camber with fats is an interesting concept.
woo baby.. pity its not road legal.. muwahahahaha..
| Quote: |
| Originally
posted by Sioux wooooowwww anyone have more pics / information ? |