Board Logo
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
[ Total Views: 413 | Total Replies: 3 | Thread Id: 19310 ]
Author: Subject: That 77 microbus
Memberkroozzn63
Bishop of Volkswagenism
******


Avatar


Posts: 3005
Threads: 317
Registered: January 31st, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Yellow
Mood: mmm coffee

cool.gif posted on February 21st, 2004 at 08:29 AM
That 77 microbus


Hey! Overall do you guys and gals think if this 77
microbus is well serviced and mantained it will get me to Caringbah and back to Camden everyday no probs its about 1 hour each way but pretty flat smooth 110 kms per deal




show us your gates
Super ModeratorBizarre
Super Moderator
The artist formerly known as blue74l
*******

Rank Avatar

Avatar


Posts: 12780
Threads: 734
Registered: August 25th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Abbotsford, Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on February 21st, 2004 at 10:23 AM


You said before it was going to be a work vehicle.

What sort of weight are you going to be carrying???

I wouldnt count on the 110km/hr too much - especially if you want economy and longevity.
More like 95 - 100 km/hr
Invest in some elephant ears and one of those bolt on oil coolers




Futue te ipsum!!!
Membermodulus
A.k.a.: Peter Hill
Veteran Volks Folk
*****


Avatar


Posts: 2009
Threads: 76
Registered: July 1st, 2003
Member Is Offline

Location: Melbourne
Theme: UltimaBB Pro White
Mood: modular

posted on February 21st, 2004 at 01:03 PM


Quote:
Originally posted by 56ovaltine
... about 1 hour each way but pretty flat smooth 110 kms per deal


Do you mean it is a 220 km daily return journey? That's 53000 km/year for a 5 day week, 48 week year.

I wouldn't chose any older vehicle for that sort of distance.

A kombi will cost up to $5000/annum more in fuel alone for that distance vs. an efficient, small, 3 or 4 cylinder. The kombi wiould pollute much more, have a *much* higher routine maintenance cost (10 oil changes/year vs. 3 for a new car) and, if it's 100+ kph commuting, be far less pleasant to drive. Add to that the exposure to accident damage and general wear and tear....

Of course, I might be misunderstanding what you've said; that wouldn't be impossible.

hth




Peter Hill
1975 Type 2 Double Cab
modulus.com.au
MemberKruizin_76
Commited Dubber
**


No Avatar


Posts: 63
Threads: 6
Registered: April 1st, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Gold Coast, queensland
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Kruizin SLOWLY

posted on April 29th, 2004 at 12:52 PM


all in all.........
looks like a nice clean bus......

KEEP ON DUBBING
MemberCruzin in a Golf
Wolfsburg Wizard
***


Avatar


Posts: 406
Threads: 23
Registered: October 13th, 2003
Member Is Offline

Location: Bendigo, Victoria
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Crazy!

posted on April 29th, 2004 at 12:57 PM


think the only problem you might encounter at 110km/h is heat exhaustion to your engine....in summer months. Especially from air cooled engine. Better to travel that distance in a water cooled...by a late model t3 bus, still vw pretty cheap and water cooled.




"I choose to Cruze VW Golf Mk1 Style!!!"
http://members.iinet.net.au/~ucanorth/avdbanner16.gif
Super Moderatorkombi_kid
Super Moderator
Good Kid too many projects
*******

Rank Avatar

No Avatar


Posts: 124
Threads: 341
Registered: August 27th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: brisvegas
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on April 29th, 2004 at 01:34 PM


if you want to run at 110km/h your going to be doing around 4000-5000 rpm which isnt healthy for any engine for long periods!
cheers
rhys




it aint just cool its aircool'd


  Go To Top


Powered by GaiaBB, © 2011 The GaiaBB Group
(C) 2001-2025 Aussieveedubbers

[ Queries: 40 ] [ PHP: 1.2% - SQL: 98.8% ]