Board Logo
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
[ Total Views: 1757 | Total Replies: 22 | Thread Id: 71507 ]
Author: Subject:  Fly by wire. Something that could be very useful.
MemberGeneral_Failure
A.k.a.: Tristan
Custom Title Time!
Use your head, don't abuse it!
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1036
Threads: 107
Registered: June 15th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Peaceful Finley, NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Streamlined2
Mood: Not too bad. Thanks for asking!

yes.gif posted on September 3rd, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Fly by wire. Something that could be very useful.


Having a fly by wire throttle is something that has rattled around in my head for years as a great mod to do to a VW. It's actually a little difficult to even see a downside to it.

I know I would love to delete the massive accelerator cable from my van. Because of its length, it is temperature sensitive, both (I guess) through expansion, and more realisticaly through the lubricant getting thicker at low temps. Also contamination inteferes with it. I noticed recently that the difference between it working and not working with a pretty beefy return spring was lubricating the accelerator pedal shaft.

Also now that I have walked the path to the dark side and ventured from standard dual carbs to the single weber progressive, I can see even more benefit to having fly by wire.

I could easily handle the electronics by myself, but the carburettor actuation and accelerator pedal position sensing are another matter. How would people go about this.

Back to my point though. Through custom electronics, it would monitor accelerator position and manifold vacuum, to avoid stumbling when planting the accelerator and also preventing lugging, which as we all know can barbecue a VW motor.
Ie. it wouldn't let the butterfly open too far, causing the vacuum to plummet. Instead it would regulate appropriately.
Now that I think of it, it would also avoid that annoying issue of stretch or slip causing full throttle to be inaccessible until the cable is readjusted.

I'm not sure if it would need feedback on current RPM. Would it? Sure, that would allow for some other nifty features like electronically regulating the idle speed, because we all know how finicky VWs can be about idling. But would it be necessary?

Another possible feature would be a brake detect. Easy to do. Just needs to connect to the brake light wiring really. Electrically isolated of course. This could kill the throttle when braking. Although who can actually push both at the same time, except for the occasional accidental stumble where the foot gets both.

What do people think of this idea. Is it worth pursuing? I believe it is. As a project at very least. Would anyone else like such a thing?




If at first you don't succeed. Build, build again.
Vehicle: 1975 Special order delivery walkthrough panel based LCA pop-top camper. Motor: Nippon 1.8L Single port Wasserboxer, Transmission: 3 rib 002.
MemberCamo
A.k.a.: Kev
Custom Title Time!
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1936
Threads: 209
Registered: October 29th, 2007
Member Is Offline

Location: Sydney - Liverpool area
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue

posted on September 3rd, 2008 at 06:59 PM



I think I have seen on a Nissan ute before where the accelerator pedal has a cable only about 6 inches long that connects to an electronic component, that then controls an electronic throttle body etc. This may be of no help, but thought I would let you know anyway.

Kev




I thought rebuilding a VW would be cheap - Shit I was wrong, just don't let the wife know !!!!

Click here for my (slowy) modded 1961 Beetle build.
MemberTratty
Casual Dubber
*


Avatar


Posts: 32
Threads: 4
Registered: July 29th, 2008
Member Is Offline

Location: Brassall
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: VW Lover In all forms

posted on September 3rd, 2008 at 08:06 PM



I don't know about about having the brake inhibit throttle operation because that would stop you using heel and toe to double the clutch whilst braking.

Tratty
MemberGeneral_Failure
A.k.a.: Tristan
Custom Title Time!
Use your head, don't abuse it!
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1036
Threads: 107
Registered: June 15th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Peaceful Finley, NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Streamlined2
Mood: Not too bad. Thanks for asking!

posted on September 3rd, 2008 at 09:29 PM



Thanks for the info Kev, That's exactly the sort of thing I want to hear.

Tratty, you make a good point. It was only a possibility anyway. I wasn't entirely sure it'd be a useful option.

I really do love the idea of lugging prevention though. It'd help prolong engine life and probably increase economy too.




If at first you don't succeed. Build, build again.
Vehicle: 1975 Special order delivery walkthrough panel based LCA pop-top camper. Motor: Nippon 1.8L Single port Wasserboxer, Transmission: 3 rib 002.
MemberGrey 57
A.k.a.: Dean
Son of Jim - Creator of Good
Old Grey Cruiser
******


Avatar


Posts: 2937
Threads: 355
Registered: August 25th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Phillip Island
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: (OoVoO) (OVO).

posted on September 3rd, 2008 at 10:35 PM



I would go for something like that. With 6 throttle body return springs, 1 injection pump return spring and 2 safety return springs, my throttle pedal gets pretty heavy. Be nice to have some servo motor do all the work
MemberGeneral_Failure
A.k.a.: Tristan
Custom Title Time!
Use your head, don't abuse it!
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1036
Threads: 107
Registered: June 15th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Peaceful Finley, NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Streamlined2
Mood: Not too bad. Thanks for asking!

posted on September 4th, 2008 at 08:35 AM



I've been asking elsewhere and apparently what they normally use is just a servo controlled by PWM. Now I just have to find a servo. A while back I stumbled across some nice strong ones somewhere at good price. Can't remember where though.



If at first you don't succeed. Build, build again.
Vehicle: 1975 Special order delivery walkthrough panel based LCA pop-top camper. Motor: Nippon 1.8L Single port Wasserboxer, Transmission: 3 rib 002.
MemberJoel
Scirocco Rare
Now containing 100% E-Wang
*********


Avatar


Posts: 9368
Threads: 211
Registered: February 14th, 2006
Member Is Offline

Location: Northern Rivers NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Purple
Mood: Tact Level 0.00

posted on September 4th, 2008 at 09:08 PM



alot of the car manufacturers are making the switch to it now
ive heard only a couple of cases with ppl having dramas
main one being lag and one that was just going haywire on its own on a Yamaha

my only experience with it is the new Same Lamborgini tractor has it and ive noticed that it can be slow to return to idle sometimes which is something u wouldnt want in a car
and the other feature which is great in a tractor is it has a memory button u can set so it always returns to those revs when u press the button
MemberGrey 57
A.k.a.: Dean
Son of Jim - Creator of Good
Old Grey Cruiser
******


Avatar


Posts: 2937
Threads: 355
Registered: August 25th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Phillip Island
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: (OoVoO) (OVO).

posted on September 5th, 2008 at 12:51 PM



Yep the Holden Astra was really bad for throttle lag . Really annoying
Membermodulus
A.k.a.: Peter Hill
Veteran Volks Folk
*****


Avatar


Posts: 2009
Threads: 76
Registered: July 1st, 2003
Member Is Offline

Location: Melbourne
Theme: UltimaBB Pro White
Mood: modular

posted on September 6th, 2008 at 09:44 AM



Sounds interesting.

Make sure the design is fail-safe, i.e. whatever goes wrong or breaks (physically or electronically) should result in a closed throttle, not e.g. wide-open throttle and the fail-safe should ideally be duplex (in case *it* fails, just like dual return springs). The other thing that comes to mind is to incorporate some appropriate "feel" or feedback to the pedal, as we're all accustomed to having to press harder for more throttle opening.

It's quite a bigish project, and I wonder whether a good fuel injection project for Type IV engines might not yield better results.

Good luck with it.




Peter Hill
1975 Type 2 Double Cab
modulus.com.au
Membermatara
Custom Title Time!
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1342
Threads: 255
Registered: August 25th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Melrose Park, Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Grey
Mood: 356'd

posted on September 6th, 2008 at 10:19 AM



Here's a Honda one on a split bus motor

http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k252/Bob_Corbishley/P9050228.jpg

And at the pedal:-

http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k252/Bob_Corbishley/P8310225.jpg

Cheers

Steve




http://www.matara.net/vwpics/myvws/sigpicx600.jpg
MemberVWCOOL
23 Windows of Awesome
********


No Avatar


Posts: 5158
Threads: 235
Registered: June 19th, 2003
Member Is Offline

Location: In the shed... Lake Macquarie NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: happy to help

posted on September 6th, 2008 at 10:31 AM



all new cars have it as it allows easy, cheap and reliable interface to chassis stability electronics (ABS, Traction etc etc) and cruise control. When Holden went to FBW on its V8s, it saved about 10kg and several hundred bucks in manufacturing costs and labour by deleting the throttle relaxer, several cables and the cruise control actuator. It also makes the car easier to tune (by the manufacturer)for cold start emissions legislation etc

It can also be programmed for different throttle 'feel' for 'sport' modes in performance cars and less throttle surge in off-road vehicles. eg BMW M series, VW Touarag

But as for fitment to a Kombi... without all those systems to support, FBW will not be 'very useful' and will be an expensive pain in the arse project...




Pay your debts, CxxT
MemberGeneral_Failure
A.k.a.: Tristan
Custom Title Time!
Use your head, don't abuse it!
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1036
Threads: 107
Registered: June 15th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Peaceful Finley, NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Streamlined2
Mood: Not too bad. Thanks for asking!

posted on September 6th, 2008 at 09:24 PM



Yeah, possibly expensive and not worth it, but definitely interesting.

I am experienced with electronics, programming and microcontrollers, so the technical aspects are pretty straightforward. There are just the X factors like a reliable method of reading the throttle position. Although I feel a decent potentiometer combined with a filtering algorithm to catch any spikes from the pot.
I have vague memories of digital position sensors, but I don't really remember them too well.

The most widely used method for actuating seems like a servo. I was looking at some 15kg metal geared unit on eBay. I just have to wonder how long they last. In the case of a servo, cut the power and they return to where their spring takes them.

Regarding accelerator response and needing to push harder for more throttle, that's what springs are best at!

It'd have no throttle and wide open sensors. The microcontroller would also have a calibration / test setting, where it checks that it still has the right duty cycle for wide open and closed throttle still works.

Personally I'm sick of wide open throttle failures. A bit of grit or moisture gets in somewhere and the painfully delicate balance of strong spring and long cable is upset.
As it is, when something adds that little bit extra drag into the setup either the throttle jams or the pedal collapses sideways. I was fighting with the sideways collapse today. I really don't like the factory accelerator pedal on the autos.




If at first you don't succeed. Build, build again.
Vehicle: 1975 Special order delivery walkthrough panel based LCA pop-top camper. Motor: Nippon 1.8L Single port Wasserboxer, Transmission: 3 rib 002.
MemberBrad
Wolfsburg Elder
*******


No Avatar


Posts: 3764
Threads: 332
Registered: August 24th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: SE QLD, Mt Nebo
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Manx Buggy Building

posted on September 6th, 2008 at 10:26 PM



I have fitted FBW to my Iguana Buggy, granted I also fitted an EJ 25T which comes factory fitted with FBW and used a late model falcon Accel pedal as it matched up with the M800 ECU and FBW controller.

It is setup that any irregularity in signal or power failer causes the TB to shut so the engine returns to idle. The great thing about FBW was that it got rid of the last cable in the system.




Brad
Why copy when you can own an original ?
Meyers Manx Australia
MemberGeneral_Failure
A.k.a.: Tristan
Custom Title Time!
Use your head, don't abuse it!
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1036
Threads: 107
Registered: June 15th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Peaceful Finley, NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Streamlined2
Mood: Not too bad. Thanks for asking!

posted on September 20th, 2008 at 09:57 AM



I haven't abandoned this idea. It's just been a bit more busy than I'd like recently.

Is there any more info on that splitty bus setup? I can't really understand what's going on there on the motor end of things.

There's a little bit more incentive now to figure this out. Now I have the Weber progressive on and the motor and throttle linkage happening, the accelerator response is utterly berzerk! It's practically impossible just to give it a little bit. It'd be really nice to add a custom tuneable response curve in there.




If at first you don't succeed. Build, build again.
Vehicle: 1975 Special order delivery walkthrough panel based LCA pop-top camper. Motor: Nippon 1.8L Single port Wasserboxer, Transmission: 3 rib 002.
Super Moderatormatberry
Super Moderator
Go hard or go home
*******

Rank Avatar

Avatar


Posts: 8114
Threads: 134
Registered: March 7th, 2006
Member Is Offline

Location: Cooroy Qld
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue
Mood: enjoying waving at all my Kombi buddies from my T3

posted on September 20th, 2008 at 01:44 PM



Talk about reinventing the wheel.

I dont have a problem with Brad , where a system, computer etc is 90% already there, but mr general failure, the throttle problems in your bus are exactly that, problems. Get it back into order, repair, clean out the tube, use oil not grease, etc etc and you will be on the road and a lot more fixable if ever anything ever goes wrong.

IMO anyway.




Matt Berry Motorsports...air cooled advice, repairs and mods Ph 0408 704 662
OFF-ROAD,CIRCUIT,DRAG,STREET,ENDURANCE
http://i375.photobucket.com/albums/oo199/mattberry-photo/20032011354-2.jpg
MemberEuro_67
Wolfsburg Wizard
***


Avatar


Posts: 690
Threads: 75
Registered: October 14th, 2003
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on September 20th, 2008 at 03:30 PM



I have a 2007 Alloytec Holden Commodore Ute with FBW. Give me back the cable actuated throttle any day. I am sure they arent all as bad as Holdens version, but Id hope there are none worse !
MemberVWCOOL
23 Windows of Awesome
********


No Avatar


Posts: 5158
Threads: 235
Registered: June 19th, 2003
Member Is Offline

Location: In the shed... Lake Macquarie NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: happy to help

posted on September 20th, 2008 at 07:44 PM



Quote:
Originally posted by General_Failure
I haven't abandoned this idea. It's just been a bit more busy than I'd like recently.

Is there any more info on that splitty bus setup? I can't really understand what's going on there on the motor end of things.

There's a little bit more incentive now to figure this out. Now I have the Weber progressive on and the motor and throttle linkage happening, the accelerator response is utterly berzerk! It's practically impossible just to give it a little bit. It'd be really nice to add a custom tuneable response curve in there.


Find the problem(s) and fix it - frayed cable; grit in the system; lack of lube; poorly-designed linkages; etc - before you frig around with electrickery




Pay your debts, CxxT
MemberVWCOOL
23 Windows of Awesome
********


No Avatar


Posts: 5158
Threads: 235
Registered: June 19th, 2003
Member Is Offline

Location: In the shed... Lake Macquarie NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: happy to help

posted on September 20th, 2008 at 07:46 PM



Quote:
Originally posted by Euro_67
I have a 2007 Alloytec Holden Commodore Ute with FBW. Give me back the cable actuated throttle any day. I am sure they arent all as bad as Holdens version, but Id hope there are none worse !


What is the problem? I've never had any problem with the dozens of FBW Holdens I've driven...?




Pay your debts, CxxT
MemberSides
A.k.a.: Dave Sidery
Veteran Volks Folk
*****


Avatar


Posts: 2220
Threads: 59
Registered: May 20th, 2007
Member Is Offline

Location: Brisbane
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue
Mood: Need... more... shed... time...

posted on September 20th, 2008 at 07:51 PM



All the cars I've driven with FBW have been fine, with the only exception being a Corolla hire-car I had in South Africa - it had about half a second lag, which since it was a manual made it VERY interesting to drive !!!

:lol:




VWDCQ vice pres & web dude - vwdcqinc.org.au
Join a car club - get car peeps

My toys
'70 Hillclimb Bug 'Jezebel' w/- Haltech EFI - http://bit.ly/VwTNtQ 
'60 KG Coupe - resto kinda started
01 New Beetle - gf's car, but I turn the spanners
MemberEuro_67
Wolfsburg Wizard
***


Avatar


Posts: 690
Threads: 75
Registered: October 14th, 2003
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on September 21st, 2008 at 07:02 AM



Quote:
Originally posted by VWCOOL
Quote:
Originally posted by Euro_67
I have a 2007 Alloytec Holden Commodore Ute with FBW. Give me back the cable actuated throttle any day. I am sure they arent all as bad as Holdens version, but Id hope there are none worse !


What is the problem? I've never had any problem with the dozens of FBW Holdens I've driven...?


It is called torque management. I have the "alleged" 190kw high output V6, and the torque management is so bad my 1776 beetle is more responsive to drive.

Really doughy off the line, and no torque. you have to rev the crap out of it, and it seems to run out of puff well before redline.The Holden dealer assures me all is ok. There are a few threads about it on various holden forums and its responsiveness can be improved about 50% with a re map to rid the torque management.

I guess my grievance with the FBW is how easily it is overridden (your throttle input) by the ECU. If I want WOT, damn it, thats what I want. Not what the ECU thinks I should have !.
MemberVWCOOL
23 Windows of Awesome
********


No Avatar


Posts: 5158
Threads: 235
Registered: June 19th, 2003
Member Is Offline

Location: In the shed... Lake Macquarie NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: happy to help

posted on September 21st, 2008 at 08:07 AM



...you shoulda got the V8!

yes, FBW throttle response can be tailored by manufacturer (or aftermarket) but the 'torque management' is an anti-abuse power-delivery strategy (usually only at WOT) to prevent the gearbox being fried...

I reckon the High Output jobbie is okay - nicer/snappier than my old HSV 5.0 - but it IS a big car with only 3.6 litres so it needs revs. Nothing will ever change that




Pay your debts, CxxT
MemberEuro_67
Wolfsburg Wizard
***


Avatar


Posts: 690
Threads: 75
Registered: October 14th, 2003
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on September 26th, 2008 at 09:48 PM



Id prefer the 5.0L BT1 i had to the alloytec any day.
MemberGeneral_Failure
A.k.a.: Tristan
Custom Title Time!
Use your head, don't abuse it!
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1036
Threads: 107
Registered: June 15th, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Peaceful Finley, NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Streamlined2
Mood: Not too bad. Thanks for asking!

posted on September 27th, 2008 at 08:47 AM



Sure I could just fix up the cable system, which I do plan on doing in the near future, somehow. If I could get hold of the pedal setup from a manual I would be far, far happier.

My current linkage geometry isn't far off from the original really. The lever coming off the accelerator cable has the same length and is at roughly the same starting angle and position.

The short cable going from the other side of that linkage to the carburettor utilised one of those constant angle, guide style throttle levers that I took from a mikuni solex progressive. I adjusted the cable position on my linkage to accommodate for the longer cable travel required by that design.

None of that is the point anyway. I just thought it would be an interesting project, especially since I also have a background in electronics. And I think a _tunable_torque control would be a great thing to have. It's far too easy to keep pushing the motor on a van too hard without realising it.




If at first you don't succeed. Build, build again.
Vehicle: 1975 Special order delivery walkthrough panel based LCA pop-top camper. Motor: Nippon 1.8L Single port Wasserboxer, Transmission: 3 rib 002.


  Go To Top


Powered by GaiaBB, © 2011 The GaiaBB Group


[ Queries: 40 ] [ PHP: 20.6% - SQL: 79.4% ]