Board Logo
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
[ Total Views: 1740 | Total Replies: 3 | Thread Id: 81881 ]
Author: Subject:  L/100 km to MPG and vice versa
MemberPhil74Camper
Son of Jim - Creator of Good
Head in the Clouds
******


Avatar


Posts: 2703
Threads: 193
Registered: August 28th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on February 9th, 2010 at 12:56 PM
L/100 km to MPG and vice versa


There seems to be quite a lot of confusion about how to convert fuel economy between the different units, especially as there are two different-sized gallons to be aware of.

For example, the latest VWMA issue #25 reports on the new VW Compact Coupe (page 97), saying: "Combined fuel consumption is claimed at 4.2 litres per 100 km, or in the world of 'yesteryear' speak, 45 miles to the gallon.'

Sorry, wrong.

To convert MPG (Imperial, or British gallon) into L/100 km, you take the constant of 282 and divide the figure into it. It works both ways:

L per 100 km = 282 / MPG
MPG = 282 / L per 100 km

In this case, 4.2 L/100 is (282/4.2) = 67.1 mpg.

And back again: 282/67.1 = 4.2.

In case you are wondering about this piece of mathematical black magic - where does 282 come from? Well there are 1.61 km in 1 mile, and there are 4.546 litres in 1 imperial gallon. 1.61 divided by 100, and divided by 4.546, and take the inverse - 282.36.

US gallons are a bit smaller than Imperial gallons, at only 3.785 litres. The constant you use for US gallons, worked out the same way, is 235.

Even using US gallon conversion, 4.2 L/100 km works out at 55.9 US MPG. So I dunno where '45 mpg' came from...
Super ModeratorBizarre
Super Moderator
The artist formerly known as blue74l
*******

Rank Avatar

Avatar


Posts: 12780
Threads: 734
Registered: August 25th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Abbotsford, Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on February 9th, 2010 at 02:46 PM



should be Km/L



Futue te ipsum!!!
MemberPhil74Camper
Son of Jim - Creator of Good
Head in the Clouds
******


Avatar


Posts: 2703
Threads: 193
Registered: August 28th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on February 10th, 2010 at 09:52 AM



Yeah I wondered about that. Miles per gallon - OK, change to metric - litres per kilometre.

But that isn't a measure of fuel consumption, it's a measure of economy. What's the difference?

Well, with mpg or km/L, when the number goes UP - say from 25 to 40 mpg - you are using LESS fuel. It's your 'economy' that is getting bigger. When the number goes DOWN, you are using MORE fuel. That's not particularly logical.

However with L/100 km, it's the other way around. When the numbers go Up - say from 7 to 10 L/100 km, you are using MORE fuel. When the numbers come DOWN, you are using LESS fuel. It's a true measuement of 'consumption' - it tells you how much fuel you consume per a given distance.

Aircraft and boats have always done the same, except in litres or gallons per hour instead.
Member1303Steve
A.k.a.: Steve Carter
Scirocco Rare
*********


Avatar


Posts: 8650
Threads: 564
Registered: August 27th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Sydney, NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Parrot Heading

posted on February 10th, 2010 at 10:31 AM



Hi

I find L/km easy to work out my fuel consumption, if I've travelled 320 ks between fills and I put 32 litres in I'm getting 10 litres/100.

Steve


  Go To Top


Powered by GaiaBB, © 2011 The GaiaBB Group
(C) 2001-2025 Aussieveedubbers

[ Queries: 40 ] [ PHP: 0.9% - SQL: 99.1% ]