| [ Total Views: 670 | Total Replies: 4 | Thread Id: 90865 ] |
|
|
 vlad01
Compulsive Aussie Vee Dubber
Posts: 4270
Threads: 109
Registered: June 3rd, 2010
Member Is Offline
Location: Kyneton, VIC
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Side ways
|
| posted on June 5th, 2011 at 06:46 PM |
|
|
interesting video about vehicle energy.
http://player.sbs.com.au/programs#/programs_08/fullepisodes/latestepisodes/pl...
enjoy!
71 notchback,
Past owner of, 70 NB, 73 SB and 72 FB TLE |
|
|
donn
Wolfsburg Elder
Posts: 3515
Threads: 428
Registered: November 30th, 2005
Member Is Offline
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue
Mood: LAID BACK AND CONFUSED
|
| posted on June 6th, 2011 at 08:35 AM |
|
|
now that's a link worth posting, thanks vlad  
I dream of a day when a chicken can cross a road without being asked for it's motive!
|
|
|
vlad01
Compulsive Aussie Vee Dubber
Posts: 4270
Threads: 109
Registered: June 3rd, 2010
Member Is Offline
Location: Kyneton, VIC
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Side ways
|
| posted on June 6th, 2011 at 03:22 PM |
|
|
yeah I knew people would like it.
best bit was about how Henry Ford would be spewing about the fact most cars(America mainly) are less economical than his model T 
over 100 years later and we have gone backwards 
71 notchback,
Past owner of, 70 NB, 73 SB and 72 FB TLE |
|
|
donn
Wolfsburg Elder
Posts: 3515
Threads: 428
Registered: November 30th, 2005
Member Is Offline
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue
Mood: LAID BACK AND CONFUSED
|
| posted on June 6th, 2011 at 03:36 PM |
|
|
| Quote: | Originally
posted by vlad01
yeah I knew people would like it.
best bit was about how Henry Ford would be spewing about the fact most cars(America mainly) are less economical than his model T
over 100 years later and we have gone backwards
|
Hmmm, saw that bit but if you take the weight of the modern car along with its performance I wonder if it is less economical, if you put a "T"
model engine in a modern car I reckon it would have trouble getting off the start line, so that bit I had to take with a grain of salt.
I dream of a day when a chicken can cross a road without being asked for it's motive!
|
|
|
vlad01
Compulsive Aussie Vee Dubber
Posts: 4270
Threads: 109
Registered: June 3rd, 2010
Member Is Offline
Location: Kyneton, VIC
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Side ways
|
| posted on June 6th, 2011 at 04:02 PM |
|
|
I actually agree with the video. we clearly have the technology (should be lack of) to make cars weigh less and more efficient engines but car
manufacture "consumers too"
are just ignoring it in the name of making money and short term satisfaction.
yep sad world we live in.
efficiency of an engine directly translates to output vs displacement.
problem being is cars are too heavy and have too large surface area. coefficient of drag (CD) has some to do with it but overall
surface area(mainly frontal area) has the biggest influence of economy as well as weight.
a bug has a a CD of 0.41 not bad at all compared to most modern cars which is 0.3 and SUV 0.45.
but.... but wait for it....... because surface area is the biggest determiner of energy required to push an object through a fluid the modern car and
especially SUV would use at least 50% if not 100% more engine kinetic energy fro cruse.
CD has nothing to do with the overall size of the vehicle only the relation of the shape to volume of the object in relation to fluid resistance.
So the most efficiency in terms of actually kinetic energy consumed to move the vehicle at cruse through a fluid would most likely be a mini. 
71 notchback,
Past owner of, 70 NB, 73 SB and 72 FB TLE |
|
|
