mnakandala Learner Dubber
4 posts · joined May 2013 ·
mnakandala Learner Dubber
4 posts · joined May 2013 ·
Joel Now containing 100\% E-Wang
9,368 posts · joined Feb 2006 ·
helbus Administrator Mad fabricator, paint and body
7,386 posts · joined Sep 2002 ·
tweety Wolfsburg Wizard
460 posts · joined Feb 2011 ·
vlad01 Compulsive Aussie Vee Dubber
4,270 posts · joined Jun 2010 ·
Are you sure they are 105kg? I sold a ea81 few years ago, I just picked it up and gave it to the buyer. Felt Like 60kg to me, it still had most of the stuff on it too.tweety wrote:If you go EJ, as said above- go 2.0 or 2.2.
If you are refering to the earlier EA series engines then they will cost you almost as much but there are some advantages over the EJ, not many but some.
The EA81 is the one to get not the OHC ea82 with its array of belts for little benefit. The ea81 with a weber 32/36 is a very simplistic engine, compact and light. So little chance of having weight issues depending on where you place your radiator etc.
The EA series has limit with modifying the intake as a water channel runs along under the manifold as part of the manifold. really the intake is primitive. Also the engine needs an approapriate cam and few other improvements whereas the eJ does not.
But if you want a compact easy to maintain engine it isnt such a bad choice. EA81 nuts like me love them because its simple old school. Otherwise- go the EJ route and get to know the engine well. It will serve you better than most engines. Go Subie!
here ius my ea81 without carbie. about 105 kgms.
tweety Wolfsburg Wizard
460 posts · joined Feb 2011 ·
OZ Towdster Keen to finish some projects
1,921 posts · joined Dec 2003 ·
No such thing as an Ej33 , they would be an EG33tweety wrote:see below
EA-81: 1,8 liter, 100 to 110 hp, about 85 kg(187lbs) dry weight
EJ-22: 2,2 liter, 130 to 160 hp, about 120 kg(265lbs) dry weight
EJ-25: 2,5 liter, 165 to 200 hp, about 135 kg(298lbs) dry weight
EJ-33: 3,3 liter, 225 to 275 hp, about 160 kg(353lbs) dry weight
Yeh likely less than 105.
That adapter plate weighs a bit.
I was thinking wet weight with all accessories. I needed to know for that time I was to replace the 1916. I lift mine out by hand too. Last week I did it again. Then lifted the auto and transaxle with Torque converter. That assembly was less weight than the ea81 engine. No wonder they use them in planes
mnakandala Learner Dubber
4 posts · joined May 2013 ·
vlad01 Compulsive Aussie Vee Dubber
4,270 posts · joined Jun 2010 ·
wow! really? EG33 is 160kg?OZ Towdster wrote:No such thing as an Ej33 , they would be an EG33tweety wrote:see below
EA-81: 1,8 liter, 100 to 110 hp, about 85 kg(187lbs) dry weight
EJ-22: 2,2 liter, 130 to 160 hp, about 120 kg(265lbs) dry weight
EJ-25: 2,5 liter, 165 to 200 hp, about 135 kg(298lbs) dry weight
EJ-33: 3,3 liter, 225 to 275 hp, about 160 kg(353lbs) dry weight
Yeh likely less than 105.
That adapter plate weighs a bit.
I was thinking wet weight with all accessories. I needed to know for that time I was to replace the 1916. I lift mine out by hand too. Last week I did it again. Then lifted the auto and transaxle with Torque converter. That assembly was less weight than the ea81 engine. No wonder they use them in planes
tweety Wolfsburg Wizard
460 posts · joined Feb 2011 ·