[ Total Views: 136068 | Total Replies: 190 | Thread Id: 27098 ] |
Pages: 1 2 3 4 .. 7 |
|
tassupervee
A.k.a.: Knob Jockey
Custom Title Time!
That really hurts doesnt it!
Posts: 1171
Threads: 25
Registered: September 21st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Huon Valley SouthernTasmania
Theme: UltimaBB Psyche Blue
Mood: Moody!
|
posted on August 19th, 2004 at 09:52 AM |
|
|
Quote: | Originally
posted by 1302Steve
The money Ive spent on EFI on my car I could have bought a EJ20T.
1302Steve
|
You make a very valid point Steve. Ratty has unloaded a heap of money into the delco setup that IMHO, would have been far better spent on somethying
like a Microtech MT-8 of an EMS Stinger.
Both these systems come ready loaded with a working map for your car and with more features available that a V-dub could ever dream about utillising,
on the fly tuning for barely a grand with a loom,,, but,,,,, nonetheless, the guys like ratty that have persisted with the like of their installations
will have the satisfaction of making it all work themselves.
Just cant put a price on that I reckon.
More power to them!
L8tr M8
E
[Edited on 18/8/04 by tassupervee]
Im not a complete idiot, quite a few parts are missing....
|
|
1303Steve
A.k.a.: Steve Carter
Scirocco Rare
Posts: 8636
Threads: 559
Registered: August 27th, 2002
Member Is Offline
Location: Sydney, NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Parrot Heading
|
posted on August 19th, 2004 at 10:40 AM |
|
|
Hi
If we wanted an easy life we would not have picked VWs to fool around with. I was offered a twin turbo suby motor the other day with harness and
computer, $1200.
I was at friend workshop the other day, he had the Delco guru with him and they were tuning a really mean 5.7 dunnydore with the Delco stuff, have to
say I was pretty impressed with what he showed me. But I think he was showing me all this stuff because my mate told him I was running Autronic.
1302Steve
|
|
1303Steve
A.k.a.: Steve Carter
Scirocco Rare
Posts: 8636
Threads: 559
Registered: August 27th, 2002
Member Is Offline
Location: Sydney, NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Parrot Heading
|
posted on August 19th, 2004 at 10:40 AM |
|
|
Pushed the button twice:bounce
[Edited on 19-8-2004 by 1302Steve]
|
|
tassupervee
A.k.a.: Knob Jockey
Custom Title Time!
That really hurts doesnt it!
Posts: 1171
Threads: 25
Registered: September 21st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Huon Valley SouthernTasmania
Theme: UltimaBB Psyche Blue
Mood: Moody!
|
posted on August 19th, 2004 at 11:23 AM |
|
|
Steve
If the Autronic was running with a closed loop mode then i would have had that system anytime. as a standalone management system anyway.
I have an old EMS T1 on my wifes Pulsar Turbo and it is fantastic old system.
I have identified a few shortcomings with the tuning parameters but these shortcomings are so insignificant when compared to ANY carb setup as to not
be there at the end of the day.!
Nah, I have a lot of respect for you guys that do it all the hard way!!
L8tr
E
Im not a complete idiot, quite a few parts are missing....
|
|
ratty 63
A.k.a.: Rossco
Custom Title Time!
Posts: 1083
Threads: 74
Registered: October 1st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Gold Coast, Qld
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Just cured my shed envy!
|
posted on August 24th, 2004 at 10:05 AM |
|
|
Final straw?
Hi all,
I think I have just about had it all happen.... this one has me stumped:
I have noticed that a couple of minuites of running the high pressure pump begins to make a ticking noise. I know that these pumps are not supposed
to make noises other than a hiss whilst they are running so I know that this is not good. Initially I thought that the pump may have been damaged (it
was from an unknown source) so I purchased another one and it does it too.... If you leave it running for any more than about 3 mins the engine begins
to lean out.
I have now noticed that when you remove the fuel supply hose (surge tank to pump) from the fuel pump after the car has been running there is a
'sucking' noise as you 'crack the seal'. As the pump is right under the surge tank I also noticed that you can hear an air bubble (I assume) in
the surge tank. Initially, when you remove the hose from the pump, almost no fuel comes out of the hose. Then, after the air bubble in the surge
tank, the fuel poors out....so it would appear that a vaccum is being generated in the surge tank!?!
I have been back over the info that I found when constructing this system and I have noticed that in almost every case, the return line from the fuel
reg is routed into the main fuel tank. I haven't done this, instead I have routed it back into the surge tank, and I think this is where the
problems is...but I don't know why! Can anyone even attempt to explain this to me?
Just a few more details about my system and the way it is connected: The surge tank is about 2 litres in capacity. It has 4 hose fittings in it - 2
in the top and 2 in the bottom. The 2 in the top are connected to the main fuel tank - one with a low pressure pump, pumping fuel from the main tank
to the surge tank, the other returning unused fuel and any air back to the main tank. The two fittings on the bottom are the supply to the high
pressure pump and the return from the fuel regulator....
Quote: |
Ratty has unloaded a heap of money into the delco setup that IMHO, would have been far better spent on somethying like a Microtech MT-8 of an EMS
Stinger. Both these systems come ready loaded with a working map for your car and with more features available that a V-dub could ever dream about
utillising, on the fly tuning for barely a grand with a loom.
|
Tassupervee, I have spent about the same money as this on the Delco ECU, however I did have to purchase and modify the loom (but a wiring loom from a
Camira is cheap and easily available and also requires very few mods). OK, so the map I started with is a Camira map, but a VW will start and run on
a Camira map (although a little rough). Have you seen a Delco/Kalmaker set-up in use? Not much you can't do. Remember that regardless of which ECU
you choose, you still have to purchase fuel pumps, TB(s), an O2 sensor, fuel rails and hoses, MAP sensor, CHT sensor, injectors, surge tank, not to
mention the dozens of hose clips, bolts, nuts, washers, etc that go into the mechanicals of the system. This is where around half of the set-up costs
have gone with my system - hence the $2000 price tag.
I personally liked the Delco/Kalmaker system. I had heard good things about it from speaking to people who had used it I had also heard bad things
about some of the other brands (some sensitive to voltage fluctuations, some poor after sales service, some a lack of information), so this influenced
my decision. I am very happy with the Kalmaker software and its abilities - I have had no issues with the ECU and software at all - all my problems
have been mechanical. Something that would effect any brand of ECU.
My suggestion to anyone looking to attempt a FI conversion is to shop around an talk to the users of these systems. This is where you will hear most
of what you need to know about reliability (both in day-to-day running and stupidity proofing:thumb ). Look at what they can do and compare this to
what you want it to do. There are dozens of options to choose from....
There are a couple of ready made systems available from sources overseas - both of the systems that I looked at appeared to be quite good, however I
was concerned with the spare parts situation, are they interchangeable with parts available in Australia or do I have to purchase everything from the
US. The price for these systems is also quite high (higher that what I have spent on my system I think, and you would still have to supply a surge
tank, fuel lines and modify your main tank for a fuel return line.....) Have a look around the CB performance site or the Webber site. Sure, they
would be easier, but $$$$$......
OK, enough from me, I'm going to see if I can understand what is going on in my surge tank:puke Any ideas?
R
|
|
Baja Wes
Bishop of Volkswagenism
V6 Baja Pioneer
Posts: 3119
Threads: 94
Registered: August 26th, 2002
Member Is Offline
Location: Brisbane
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Content
|
posted on August 24th, 2004 at 12:13 PM |
|
|
sound kinda similar to the weird cutting out problem I had with my surge tank set-up, but your set-up is now similar to my corrected set-up so I
wouldn't have thought you'd have any problems.
It sounds like the surge tank is starving for fuel.
Have you connected the low pressure pump backwards so it is pumping from the surge tank to the main tank? That would start the HP pump of fuel.
Is the fuel line from the surge tank to the HP pump big enough, free of restrictions, tight bends, filters, etc?
Put your hand on the surge tank, is it getting warm at all?
|
|
ratty 63
A.k.a.: Rossco
Custom Title Time!
Posts: 1083
Threads: 74
Registered: October 1st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Gold Coast, Qld
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Just cured my shed envy!
|
posted on August 24th, 2004 at 01:53 PM |
|
|
Hi Wes,
...yeah, it sounds like that, however I have dissconnected the low pressure return line from the surge tank to the main tank and have extended the
hose so that I could run it back in through the filler hole of the main tank - this way I could see what the return to the tank looked like and check
for air, surging fuel pressure, etc. The return is constant and contains no obvious air bubbles. I then removed both the low pressure lines from the
surge tank and started the car (with the low pressure pump disabled:duh). The idea here was to use the two hose fittings at the top of the tank as
vents (to ensure no vac in the tank). It still stalled (the surge tank was still at least half full). The vac seems to be forming in the hose
between the pump and the surge tank....?!?
The hose between the pump and the surge tank is quite long which is not really necessary (I just had a spare piece of fuel hose, so this is what I
used - I had planned on trimming it to the right size once I have everything mounted.) It is currently all above the height of the pump, so no air
should be trapped. The only two things that I can think of are a) I have used right angle fittings on the bottom of the surge tank so that the hoses
are kept up as far as possible - perhaps the restriction of the right angle is causing some sort of problem (but I wouldn't think so!) or b) the
return from the fuel regulator contains so much air that it is being drawn into the pump (I wouldn't think that this would be correct either, but
I'm clutching at straws here...)
The hoses are all free of restrictions and the filter on the HP side of the system is after the pump.
The surge tank is stone cold, as are all the fuel lines and rails.... the engine is only running for around 2 mins before the pump begins to make
noises so I wouldn't think that there would be enough time for anything to get hot...?
Hmmmmm
R
|
|
ratty 63
A.k.a.: Rossco
Custom Title Time!
Posts: 1083
Threads: 74
Registered: October 1st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Gold Coast, Qld
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Just cured my shed envy!
|
posted on August 24th, 2004 at 01:59 PM |
|
|
Wes, I just had another look at your web site and the only difference between your surge tank set-up and mine is the fact that you are using an
internal pump and mine is external - again, I wouldn't have thought that would cause any sort of problems....
R
|
|
Baja Wes
Bishop of Volkswagenism
V6 Baja Pioneer
Posts: 3119
Threads: 94
Registered: August 26th, 2002
Member Is Offline
Location: Brisbane
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Content
|
posted on August 24th, 2004 at 03:26 PM |
|
|
what size line are you running to the HP pump?
That line should be very short, as short as possible. It should preferrably be straight with no bends.
Right angle bends are bad for flow. One right angle bend is equivalent to a few meters of straight pipe pressure loss wise. Then you sound like you
have a big length of pipe on top of that. That's bad for fuel flow. The high pressure pump is trying to pump that fuel at a pretty fast rate, so it
loses alot of pressure in the lines leading up to the pump. I don't have the problem as my pump is swimming in the fuel.
Fuel has a very high vapour pressure, meaning it doesn't take much of a pressure drop (or temperature rise) for it to vaporise. I think that's
what's it's doing. It vaporising in the pump, known as cavitation. It makes weird little crackle rattle kinda noises when it's bad enough.
Try as little hose as you can before the pump, it should be a decent diameter too.
|
|
Baja Wes
Bishop of Volkswagenism
V6 Baja Pioneer
Posts: 3119
Threads: 94
Registered: August 26th, 2002
Member Is Offline
Location: Brisbane
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Content
|
posted on August 24th, 2004 at 03:38 PM |
|
|
this is basically what your running, which is basically what I am running;
I grabbed that from http://www.sdsefi.com/dman.htm
|
|
Baja Wes
Bishop of Volkswagenism
V6 Baja Pioneer
Posts: 3119
Threads: 94
Registered: August 26th, 2002
Member Is Offline
Location: Brisbane
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Content
|
posted on August 24th, 2004 at 04:31 PM |
|
|
here's a good link that some may find handy, it talks about converting from carby to EFI
http://www.autospeed.com.au/cms/A_0520/article.html
I have the 21st Century Performance book written by that guy, and he knows his stuff.
He basically saiys you need at least a 1/2" line to feed the EFI pump, and it should be mounted as close as possible (and always below the fuel
level). Most of the guys running surge tanks for conversions or track use have a 1/2" outlet on the surge tank, point striaght into the HP pump. No
bends or anything, and a very short length of hose.
Another company that sells intank pump kits has the following to say about fitting external pumps...
Quote: | Common problems
associated with stock fuel tanks and fabricated pickups are pump cavitation, vapor lock, varying fuel pressure, exaggerated pump wear and lean
conditions during both low and high loads. Note: Unlike a carbureted engine, any loss of fuel supply at the in-tank- pickup will immediately
result in a loss of fuel volume and pressure at the EFI injector resulting in lean conditions and engine damage.
|
hinted at potential problems with starving the HP pump of fuel.
|
|
ratty 63
A.k.a.: Rossco
Custom Title Time!
Posts: 1083
Threads: 74
Registered: October 1st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Gold Coast, Qld
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Just cured my shed envy!
|
posted on August 25th, 2004 at 10:27 AM |
|
|
Thanks Wes,
All of that info says what I was thinking. I suspect that the length of hose is causing the problem - that, coupled with the right angle hose fitting
in the tank is likely to be the cause. I will go and shorten the length of hose between the fuel pump and surge tank and give it another go.
I spoke to my Brother about this problem too, and although he wasn't sure of the cause he suggested that I check inside the surge tank for foreign
objects that could be partly blocking the hose fitting. Apparently he has seen something similar in a Kombi that he had at work once - it had lolly
wrappers in the fuel tank :duh that would float around in the fuel until one was drawn over the tank outlet by the fuel flow. It would then block the
outlet and the engine would stop. Once the engine stopped, so would the fuel flow and the wrapper would float away from the tank outlet, so the car
would then re-start OK - strange but true! My Surge tank in new and I don't store my lolly wrappers in the fuel tank so I can't imagine that being the cause, but I will have a look whilst I
have it all apart anyway.
I think that if I was to re-make the surge tank again, I would create it so that it suited an internal pump for a couple of reasons:
1. One less thing to have to mount = less hose
2. Internal pumps are usually cheaper than external pumps
3. There is no length of hose/right angle fitting issues!
Finally, that drawing above is Identical to the set-up that I have, except I have my return from the fuel reg going into the bottom of the tank. I am
using a fitting in the bottom of the surge tank that is the same diameter as the hose fitting on the pump - obviously the hose between the two is the
correct size to suit.
I'm off now to shorten the hose and check the internals of my surge tank - I'll post the results.....
R :duh
|
|
tassupervee
A.k.a.: Knob Jockey
Custom Title Time!
That really hurts doesnt it!
Posts: 1171
Threads: 25
Registered: September 21st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Huon Valley SouthernTasmania
Theme: UltimaBB Psyche Blue
Mood: Moody!
|
posted on August 25th, 2004 at 06:10 PM |
|
|
Ratty
Once again I am not casting aspersions at your choice of clobber.
I believe that the delco/kalmaker combo is very tuneable.
However, I have had the benifit of using both EMS T1-4 on my wifes turbo e15et (pulsar) and the Microtech MT-8 on my FJ20et.
Plus I have had experience with other Microtechs on atmo and turbo rotors.
I have dealt with both Dom (Microtech) and Pete (EMS) and only have good experiences with them.
Both the systems came ready to run and both systems did exactly that and I enjoy the fact that when I identify a tuning issue with either of my
systems I simply reach under the seat, grab the handpeice and tune away based on the EGO readings.
Its all too easy.
I get a bit suspicious of up to 20 year old electronics and wiring hardware ratted from wrecked cars thats all.
Id much rather start from fresh with a spankers loom custom fitted to my particular application.
Anyway keep at it dude and best of luck.
L8tr
E
Im not a complete idiot, quite a few parts are missing....
|
|
ratty 63
A.k.a.: Rossco
Custom Title Time!
Posts: 1083
Threads: 74
Registered: October 1st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Gold Coast, Qld
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Just cured my shed envy!
|
posted on August 26th, 2004 at 01:42 AM |
|
|
thoughts
Tassupervee,
I s'pose it all comes down to what your are most comfortable with - and I can deffinatly see why you would want to start with a brand new wiring
loom! This just proves that any recommendation (of a brand/model) comes with some personal preference included and is not just based on facts and
figures. There are many good systems out there - it's just a matter of finding the right one for you....
On the subject of what appears to be my fuel starvation problem, I have spoken to many people today and it would appear that I am creating a vacuum in
my surge tank by using hose fittings and hoses that are too small on the low pressure side. I don't completely understand why (I think you would
need a degree in hydraulics to understand!:thumb), but this is the basics of it, as explained to me by someone who has studied hydralics:
'When using a two pumps in a system including a system that contains a storage container (surge tank in my case), the highest flow rate of the of the
two pumps is what controls the flow rate of the system.'
Let me see if I can give you an example - I looked around and found these figures in another post regarding surge tanks:
Quote: |
a few figures for the interested, fuel flow from EFI pumps, all at 40psi.
XE falcon = 1.8 L/min
VL holden = 2.3 L/min
6.9 Merc = 2.7 L/min
R32 GTR skyline = 4.5L/min
|
Quote: |
facet fuel pump is rated at 2.2 L/min flow
|
Now, my HP pump is a VL Commodore unit (rated at 2.3L/min) and my low pressure pump is a facet pump (rated at 2.2 l/min) - therefore it is possible
that the HP pump is trying to draw 2.3L/min and the LP pump is supplying 2.2 L/min
If this was the situation this would mean that:
2.2 - 2.3 = -0.1 <- this negative value indicates that in a system like this, a vacuum is being created. If the value was positive it would
indicate that there was pressure being created in the tank, which may cause other problems (although not likely in my case as there is a return line
to the main tank which, I think, would allow this pressure to escape)
Now I know that my LP pump would be having trouble flowing 2.2 L/min as the hoses and fittings are way too small, so I will upgrade them tomorrow (er,
actually later today:P) and do my own tests.
I will also take the time to test the pump that was originally sold to me as a high pressure pump, but turned out to be a low pressure pump - I think
that it will flow better than the facet pump - time will tell.
Of course, if I have this all ass-up and anyone would like to correct what I have written, please feel free as I don't wish to mislead anyone! I
also realise that this is a very 'dumbed down' version of what is really happening so that I could be made to understand the basics and there is a
lot more to it! :thumb
Just before I sign off, Wes, what size hose are you using between your fuel tank and the surge tank? This may explain why our systems are basically
identical but yours works and mine doesn't.
OK, thats it for now - time for bed!
R
|
|
Baja Wes
Bishop of Volkswagenism
V6 Baja Pioneer
Posts: 3119
Threads: 94
Registered: August 26th, 2002
Member Is Offline
Location: Brisbane
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Content
|
posted on August 26th, 2004 at 08:34 AM |
|
|
Ratty,
Whoever explained that to you has led you up the garden path, and completely confused you.
What they are describing, is what would happen if your HP pump / fuel rail return line was returning to the main tank. Then your LP pump would have to
keep up with your HP pump. This is why I have told people not to return the HP pump to the main tank.
But with your set-up, the HP pump goes from the surge tank, thru the fuel rail, and back to the surge tank. That is a relatively closed loop that fuel
could circulate around forever.
But when the engine is running fuel is lost from that loop, through the injectors and into the engine. The LP pump only has to supply enough make-up
fuel to the surge tank to refill what is lost through the injectors. This is much less fuel than what the HP pump is actually pumping.
So you LP pump is not causing you any issues. When I first set-up mine I didn't even have a LP pump and let it gravity feed into the surge tank. The
problem I had then was then closed loop of HP pump > fuel rail > surge tank kept recirculating and eventually made the fuel to hot and caused a
kind of vapor lock. So my LP pump is simply installed to circulate fuel from the surge tank to the main tank to even out the temperature.
Basically the LP pump will be pumping heaps of fuel to the surge tank, the engine will hardly use any of it, and the majority will simply return back
to the main tank.
My LP pump lines are 10mm, but that's because they started off as gravity feed lines.
My HP pump lines are 8mm. If I had an external HP pump I would use a 1/2" line to feed it.
Trust me, your LP set-up isn't causing your problems.
|
|
1303Steve
A.k.a.: Steve Carter
Scirocco Rare
Posts: 8636
Threads: 559
Registered: August 27th, 2002
Member Is Offline
Location: Sydney, NSW
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Parrot Heading
|
posted on August 26th, 2004 at 09:42 AM |
|
|
Hi
Leigh and I are both using Carter lift pumps, not sure of their rating and we both return our fuel to the tank, never had a problem.
Steve
|
|
Baja Wes
Bishop of Volkswagenism
V6 Baja Pioneer
Posts: 3119
Threads: 94
Registered: August 26th, 2002
Member Is Offline
Location: Brisbane
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Content
|
posted on August 26th, 2004 at 10:25 AM |
|
|
I imagine the carter lift pumps have a healthy enough flow rate to keep up with the HP pump. If it wasn't quite enough it would suck itself through
the return line from the surge to the main tank anyway (I assume you have this line otherwise you'd be pressurising your surge tank).
I guess the main point is that the LP pump is not causing the issues that he's experiencing.
|
|
ratty 63
A.k.a.: Rossco
Custom Title Time!
Posts: 1083
Threads: 74
Registered: October 1st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Gold Coast, Qld
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Just cured my shed envy!
|
posted on August 26th, 2004 at 11:45 AM |
|
|
Hmmm, thanks guys....
Looks like time to experiment and see if we can improve things.... I am going to change surge tanks to my brothers tank as his is larger in
capacity... I am also going to experiment with where the hoses connect to the surge tank to see if I am not creating some sort of fuel swirl inside
the tank which is causing it do to strange things....
This has got me stuffed....
R
|
|
Baja Wes
Bishop of Volkswagenism
V6 Baja Pioneer
Posts: 3119
Threads: 94
Registered: August 26th, 2002
Member Is Offline
Location: Brisbane
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Content
|
posted on August 26th, 2004 at 12:15 PM |
|
|
What size line is feeding your HP pump now?
Have you moved it close to the surge tank?
Can you get rid of the 90 degree elbow?
|
|
ratty 63
A.k.a.: Rossco
Custom Title Time!
Posts: 1083
Threads: 74
Registered: October 1st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Gold Coast, Qld
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Just cured my shed envy!
|
posted on August 27th, 2004 at 02:29 PM |
|
|
OK, I have tried a number of configurations - all with no luck...
Wes, I have about 3 inches of 12.7mm fuel hose between the bottom of the surge tank and the inlet of the HP pump. As yet I haven't removed the right
angle fitting (its the Gold Coast Show holiday today, so nothing is open )
I'll change it first thing tomorrow morning after I visit the hose suppliers.
I have upgraded the fuel line from the main tank to the surge tank (and all the fittings) to 8mm hose and I have tried fitting the low pressure pump
both under the surge tank and under the main tank. I am now feeding the low pressure fuel into the surge tank through the bottom of the tank and
returning the fuel from the fuel rail/regulator through the top of the tank. The inlet to the HP pump is now directly opposite the return from the
reg....
I have even checked the voltage at the fuel pumps again today to be certain - both have 12.9 - 13.1 at an idle, so I can't see it being a voltage
issue....
I pulled the return line off the surge tank with the engine running and there is a good amount of fuel being returned back to the tank - (I hate it
when you squirt yourself in the face with petrol - Yuk :puke ).... this makes me think I might be looking in the wrong place.....
Can anyone tell me, if there is too much fuel being returned to the surge tank (via the fuel reg) what would the HP pump be likely to do? I know that
this would cause the engine to run lean - particularly if the pump could not get enough pressure to the injectors.....
Also, last night, whilst making one of a hundred Pizzas at work, I realised that I didn't know what a Carter pump is/does/looks like - can anyone
give me a description (or even a photo)?
Unless someone here can come up with another idea, I think I will do a couple of things tomorrow and see what effect they have:
1) replace the right angle fitting in the bottom of the surge tank.
2) remove the surge tank completely and fit the HP pump directly in the line from the fuel tank - not permanantly, but as an experiment to see if it
still has its rattling fits after a couple of minuites.
3) if 1 doesn't fix the problem and 2 does, then I will fit up my brothers larger surge tank and try that - can't see how it will make a difference,
but you have to try it to know....
...any other suggestions? I'm getting desperate! :bounce
Whilst I'm asking questions - is just wonder if it is necessary to 'force feed' the VL pumps.... does any one know?
OK, I've had enough for today - I'm going to work.
R
|
|
AdrianH
Officially Full-On Dubber
Posts: 257
Threads: 20
Registered: March 5th, 2004
Member Is Offline
Location: New Zealand
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: rebuilding again
|
posted on August 27th, 2004 at 02:58 PM |
|
|
This may sound stupid, but have you tried to run it with the fuel tank cap off ? Just in case there is a vacuum problem there ??. Main tank vent
blocked or non existant ?
FWIW - you lose about 5% flow with a 90 degree bend
|
|
ratty 63
A.k.a.: Rossco
Custom Title Time!
Posts: 1083
Threads: 74
Registered: October 1st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Gold Coast, Qld
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Just cured my shed envy!
|
posted on August 27th, 2004 at 03:05 PM |
|
|
I have tried to run it with the fuel tank cap off - no difference (unfortunatly).
Silly question time - if I remove the vacuum hose off the top of the fuel regulator, that should increase the fuel pressure causing the engine to run
rich shouldn't it? Mine doesn't - have I got an issue with the fuel reg??? Put that on the list of things to check tomorrow - I know that the
quantity of fuel returned from the reg at an idle should be around 750ml/30secs (or so I am told)....
I'm so confused:duh
R
|
|
Baja Wes
Bishop of Volkswagenism
V6 Baja Pioneer
Posts: 3119
Threads: 94
Registered: August 26th, 2002
Member Is Offline
Location: Brisbane
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Content
|
posted on August 28th, 2004 at 11:09 AM |
|
|
Quote: | Originally
posted by AdrianH
FWIW - you lose about 5% flow with a 90 degree bend
|
I don't know where that came from, but it's not correct.
If you only have a 90 degree bend, then it is basically 100% of your friction loss. What effect those losses have on the actual flow rate depends on
the pressure-head curve of the pump. Therefore you can not apply any rules of thumb like you suggested. And all that really applies to the
HP-discharge side of the pump.
On the suction side is a different matter. The pump will have a NPSHr - net positive suction head required. The NSPHa (available) must be higher than
the required for the pump. By having restrictions (such as 90 bends or filters) before the pump, you are lowering the NPSHa. If it drops below the
NPSHr then you get cavitation > pump damage > reduction or loss in pump flow. All this can acutally be calculated if you have the data for the
pump (NPSHr), but I don't like your chances of finding it for a car fuel pump. I've done the calculation on way too many industrial pumps to count
though.
Anyway, back to the story. the vacuum line to the regulator will vary the fuel pressure, but only a relatively small amount compared to the high
pressure the fuel is delivered at. I'm not sure your air fuel read-outs would be sensitive enough to see the effect of removing the vacuum hose off
the regulator.
Sounds like you need a fuel pressure guage. See what happens to the actual fuel pressure. Really no matter what the regulator is setting the pressure
at (within reason) you'll get a similar amount of fuel getting returned back to the surge tank. So calculating that flow probably won't tell you
alot. You won't be able to say "oh I'm getting too much fuel returned to the surge, it must be running lean and not getting enough fuel pressure",
it doesn't work like that.
Another thing that I thought about, do you know what duty cycle your injectors are working at?
The reason I ask is that by running batch mode your injectors work more often (but not for as long) than in sequential injection. If your running a
high duty cycle then maybe the injectors are overheating after a few minutes of running and causing your troubles. It would also have probs when
revving the engine using full throttle too is that was the case. Just something else to consider...
|
|
AdrianH
Officially Full-On Dubber
Posts: 257
Threads: 20
Registered: March 5th, 2004
Member Is Offline
Location: New Zealand
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: rebuilding again
|
posted on August 29th, 2004 at 08:41 AM |
|
|
Hey I am reading a book called Forced induction performance tuning, in it it states " Some however choose to use a small pump to feed the swirl pot
and run the fuel return line back to the swirl pot rather than to the fuel tank. I do not believe this is a good idea for two reasons: unless the
swirl pot is fairly large it can run dry at high engine loads and high RPM, and second, at lower engine loadings the fuel will get hot circulating in
a closed loop and the engine could become dangerously lean"
Might help ??
Baja Wes - thanks for the flow info...
|
|
tassupervee
A.k.a.: Knob Jockey
Custom Title Time!
That really hurts doesnt it!
Posts: 1171
Threads: 25
Registered: September 21st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Huon Valley SouthernTasmania
Theme: UltimaBB Psyche Blue
Mood: Moody!
|
posted on August 29th, 2004 at 09:48 AM |
|
|
Aidrian, I cant see your logic here dude.
If the engine fuel return is fed to the surge tank, the chances of the surge tank running out are actually significantly lessened.
The lift pump only has to deliver enough fuel to cover what the engine uses. In most cases, this will be easily covered by nearl any electric fuel
pump.
If the engine fuel return is piped direct to the main fuel tank, the lift pump has to cover what the engine uses AND what the fuel pressure regulator
bypasses.
This is often in excess of what many single electric fuel pumps can cover.
The fuel gets warm yes but since it is technically not a closed loop in practise the fuel does not get overly hot as the lift pump is always supplying
some fuel into the pot to replace what is used, even at idle and the pot by its nature looses heat like a radiator.
The heating of the fuel in the surge tank is relatively insignificant in the overall scheme of things.
Im not a complete idiot, quite a few parts are missing....
|
|
tassupervee
A.k.a.: Knob Jockey
Custom Title Time!
That really hurts doesnt it!
Posts: 1171
Threads: 25
Registered: September 21st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Huon Valley SouthernTasmania
Theme: UltimaBB Psyche Blue
Mood: Moody!
|
posted on August 29th, 2004 at 09:59 AM |
|
|
Ratty
You have described your surge tank LP feed, HP feed and engine bypass returns.
Obviously, the HP feed needs to be at or near the bottom of the tank, the engine bypass return should be above this to prevent hot fuel and/or any air
directly recirculating same with the LP supply from the lift pump.
Where exactly is your surge tank vent/return back to the main tank? At the very top I presume?
Just a thought.
L8tr
E
Im not a complete idiot, quite a few parts are missing....
|
|
AdrianH
Officially Full-On Dubber
Posts: 257
Threads: 20
Registered: March 5th, 2004
Member Is Offline
Location: New Zealand
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: rebuilding again
|
posted on August 30th, 2004 at 05:26 AM |
|
|
Tas, its someone elses logic - direct quote
|
|
ratty 63
A.k.a.: Rossco
Custom Title Time!
Posts: 1083
Threads: 74
Registered: October 1st, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Gold Coast, Qld
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Just cured my shed envy!
|
posted on August 30th, 2004 at 11:28 AM |
|
|
Thanks for your input guys - I have a confession to make:
I have finally found the problem - but it's not over yet....
I discovered when I removed the return line from the top of the surge tank (the one from the fuel reg) that the flow was ... er ... significantly less
than what I was told... actually there was nothing coming out at all at any time, regardless of engine revs. It would appear that the fuel reg is
blocked or faulty in some way and no longer allows the returned fuel to go through - it's always the things you check last and/or assume are working
OK that catch you out.
I assume that this would have been causing the pump to get to full pressure, overheat and boil the fuel, causing the strange vaccum that I
observed.
Strangly now, having replaced the pressure reg with one from a running VL (have you ever tried to get one of these out of a VL - don't! Pay someone
else to do it - not easy!) I am unable to get the engine to run correctly - it's always lean unless I run the injectors at almost 100% - and thats
just at idle! Before I start looking for more equipment failures, I'm going to reset the Calabration in the ECU and check the fuel pressure at the
injectors...
If its not one thing, its another!
I'll let you know how it all goes....
Thanks again guys - I appreciate the help. :kiss
Just something I noticed - does anyone know what the fuel damper does in the GM fuel systems - no manuals make any mention of their function, just how
to remove and install them - I don't have one (and as far as I know neither do the Kombis, which use a very similar system) - they are mounted just
after the high pressure pump, usually under the rear of a Commodore/Camira.
Thanks again (geez I feel stupid for not checking that earlier :blush )
R
[Edited on 30-8-2004 by ratty 63]
|
|
Baja Wes
Bishop of Volkswagenism
V6 Baja Pioneer
Posts: 3119
Threads: 94
Registered: August 26th, 2002
Member Is Offline
Location: Brisbane
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Content
|
posted on August 30th, 2004 at 12:26 PM |
|
|
Quote: | Originally
posted by ratty 63
actually there was nothing coming out at all at any time, regardless of engine revs.
|
Well that would certainly explain your problems. Not very good for the pump, and probably quite dangerous too. I woulda thought the fuel filter might
have started getting hot, also pays to check that things that are supposed to be cold actually are cold.
I've seen industrial pumps (we're talking 300mm diameter suction and discharge piping) that have been operating away happily, and then some idiot
closes the discharge valve, stopping flow in a similar fashion to your fuel reg. Anyway it operates like that for a while, but the heat of churning
the fluid inside the pumps builds and builds until the fluid in the pump boils, then probably starts superheating. The pressure in the pump builds so
much the pump physically expodes, it's like a bomb going off. We found one large chunk of cast iron pump casing about 20m away from the pump.
Anyway, back to the thread. Don't know what a damper does, but going by the name I'd say it dampens. Either the pump design, or the injectors
working, must cause pressure pulsations in the fuel lines, and I guess the damper is there to try to dampen the pulsations out.
|
|
Midlife crisis
Veteran Volks Folk
Nartispuddlejumper, Bureau of Toxicity
Posts: 2282
Threads: 160
Registered: May 17th, 2003
Member Is Offline
Location: Logan city south of Brisbane
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Wornout and Toxic
|
posted on August 30th, 2004 at 01:45 PM |
|
|
After read some posts on an US site about FI Wes you hit the button on the head it is there to stop the pulsations, so the injectors get a steady flow
of fuel
Marc
If you can't laugh at yourself you can't laugh at anyone else! Because life is to short not to LAUGH
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 .. 7 |