Board Logo
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
[ Total Views: 2763 | Total Replies: 45 | Thread Id: 78161 ]
 Pages:  1  2
Author: Subject:  1776 questions
Super Administratorvw54
Super Administrator
Always Waiting 4 Friday
*********

Rank Avatar

No Avatar


Posts: 16723
Threads: 378
Registered: August 26th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Sunny Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Oval resto ongoing

posted on August 6th, 2009 at 08:43 AM



Quote:

Cam - Engle W100 - $150ish (classicveedub)



you might as well use a STOCK VW cam no bumps on that one




MemberBiX
Veteran Volks Folk
*****


Avatar


Posts: 2499
Threads: 154
Registered: September 2nd, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Brisbane
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on August 6th, 2009 at 10:01 AM



The W100, is pretty close to stock, but I found it gave a nice spread of torque.



I have no sympathy for my car, only the wallet that pays for it!
Go hard or go home!!!!
MemberOld Hutcho
Officially Full-On Dubber
***


Avatar


Posts: 281
Threads: 54
Registered: January 1st, 2004
Member Is Offline

Location: Bomaderry NSW. 2541
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: NSW Blues supporter to the end!

posted on August 6th, 2009 at 07:49 PM



Brother.

I am lucky enough to have a 1776 (single carb, pretty much a stocker with bigger Los Banditos Heads) and a 1916 (twin kad, engle 110 cam and lost banditos heads) and neither are firebreathers. But both are excellent street cruise engines with loads of torque and will pull like a train all day at 100 kph. So. Which way do you go. I can tell you that the yanks have put nearly 50 years development into both these size engines, so there is something to be said for both. My two bobs worth.?? For a stockish car go the 1776, use the Los Banditos heads heads and dual kads. Its not stressed and it wont get hot so it will last a long time. And unless you are into blowing the ricers off at the lights, nobody is going to leave you behind. Whichever way you go mate, relax. Build the engine you want and learn to love it.:love:


Old Hutcho
Membercb john
Wolfsburg Wizard
***


Avatar


Posts: 470
Threads: 6
Registered: June 22nd, 2007
Member Is Offline

Location: Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue

posted on August 6th, 2009 at 08:23 PM



Quote:
A formula Vee engine is NOT a stock standard engine,
and should not be used a guideline (or comparison) for a reliable street engine.

Other than exhaust and camshaft being non standrd,
the valvetrain geopmetry that is used to acheive extra lift is very hard on the valve train in the wear area.


Tis is not absolutely correct, the camshaft is Stock, the only difference is not running the muffler and generator / worth a few horses /
Max. allowed lift on intake is 9.6 mm and exhaust 9.2...
I really do not see the reason why this does not qualify as the stock engine.
Not to say, that aftermarket high lift cams and dual valve springs put a lot more strain on the valve train than Vee will ever do...
Memberdangerous
A.k.a.: Dave Butler Muffin Man
23 Windows of Awesome
********


Avatar


Posts: 5901
Threads: 178
Registered: January 6th, 2005
Member Is Offline

Location: Gold Coast
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: 591

posted on August 7th, 2009 at 07:02 AM



Just to clarify,
the formula vee engines use a "control cam" ground by Wade.
The stock cams I have measured only have between .300" and at best .330" lift.
So 9.2mm(.362") and 9.6mm(.378") is more than stock.
Very similar lift to the W100 and C25 profiles.

I can not recall the duration of the VEE "control" cam.,
but will say that most are installed very retarded
to move the torque and HP peaks well above the stock rpm location.

The Vees use a pushrod extension(or longer pushrods),
and set the geometry so that the adjuster tip is right on the edge.
This wears very fast.

As do the valve guides with the poor geometry.
,
You may argue that this is stock, but I will not agree so I guess we can agree to disagree.
You could say:
"it is a stock engine with aftermarket cam, custom exhaust, aftermarket
air cleaner, pushrods/mods, lightened components, extra sump capacity, loose clearances, performance valve job"

Heavier than stock valve springs do draw a very small amount of extra HP,
but if geometry is correct,they can actually extend the life of the valve train by providing better CONTROL
and there is no need to go to a dual spring in a lot of cases.
Correct geometry on all but the most radical RACE cam and rocker set ups
will require less adjutmsent and get less valvegude and seat wear than most vee engines..."per Mile".

Again everyone is welcome to disagree....that is what a forum is.

Good to see that Hutcho has tried something similar to what you are after Jason.
I think you will be very happy once you get it on the road.
You can always upgrade the heads at a future time.
Make sure you get those carbs jetted correctly,
and fit balance tubes to ALL the runners to smooth out the idle




Quote:
Originally posted by westi
That's mad Alan.
Membercolonel mustard
Son of Jim - Creator of Good
******


No Avatar


Posts: 2829
Threads: 51
Registered: February 27th, 2009
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Black

posted on August 7th, 2009 at 09:05 AM



Hey Dave, What do you think about these 'Los Banditios' heads... They seem like a good option to me considering the cost of machining is $110 [size=4]a pair[/size]
But is there any reason why they won't be a good match??

Thanks for all your tips btw, its great :)

*edit* - i meant for the pair.
Memberdangerous
A.k.a.: Dave Butler Muffin Man
23 Windows of Awesome
********


Avatar


Posts: 5901
Threads: 178
Registered: January 6th, 2005
Member Is Offline

Location: Gold Coast
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: 591

posted on August 7th, 2009 at 12:19 PM



The "features" they have seem good for the price,
but i have no hands on experience with them.

I would not consider putting them on the engine without checking them fully
and doing some basic blending and deburring of the ports and chambers.
Plus check spring shimming and pressures.

But that advice goes for ANY cylinder head you choose.




Quote:
Originally posted by westi
That's mad Alan.
Membercb john
Wolfsburg Wizard
***


Avatar


Posts: 470
Threads: 6
Registered: June 22nd, 2007
Member Is Offline

Location: Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue

posted on August 7th, 2009 at 03:28 PM



Quote:

You may argue that this is stock, but I will not agree so I guess we can agree to disagree.



I agree to disagree...
Memberchunks54
Slammed & Awesome Dubber
**


No Avatar


Posts: 84
Threads: 7
Registered: August 3rd, 2009
Member Is Offline

Location: UK
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on August 7th, 2009 at 06:07 PM



Hey mustard here's a link to webcam website - I have other links if you're interested hahaha... lets not go there! :punk:

http://www.webcamshafts.com/ 

Engle have gone bump (cam pun intended!) so other manufacturers may be the better option anyway.

The extra cc's of a 1776 or a 1915 will rock if you're used to a standard whatever you do, but I GUARANTEE that within a few weeks you'll want MORE MORE MORE :lol:

I started with a velocity stack, adjustable main jet and a pounded-bigger single port manifold (don't ask!).... the slope is VERY slippery....
Good luck mate.




Happiness is a Hot VW.

1954 Bug, 2276/Turbo

Turbo lag - that split second when the other guy thinks he has a chance
Membercolonel mustard
Son of Jim - Creator of Good
******


No Avatar


Posts: 2829
Threads: 51
Registered: February 27th, 2009
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Black

posted on August 9th, 2009 at 02:42 AM



Quote:
Originally posted by dangerous
The "features" they have seem good for the price,
but i have no hands on experience with them.

I would not consider putting them on the engine without checking them fully
and doing some basic blending and deburring of the ports and chambers.
Plus check spring shimming and pressures.

But that advice goes for ANY cylinder head you choose.


Thats cause your Dave butler! Good advice, thanks :)

Took my mates 1776 for a drive yesterday (by myself.. hahaha, its more fun when they aren' there..) and it has a fair bit of guts. But Im just thinking about how much it actually is. About 2 months ago I dove Izac's squareback with 36 dell's on a 1600, and honestly, it had nearly as much power. so my thoughts are, how much more guts am I going to get out of my 1600 with the twin kadrons, and the better exhaust. A fair bit? yes (and It wont sound like a truck). My next thought is, how much more fuel efficient are kadrons than DRLA's?? and How much more power Could I get from a 1776 (like my mates) from DRLA's??? Yes, again all combo questions, but whats stupping me from wringing the 1600's neck (yes I know i could blow it...) before stepping up to the 1776??

haha. I know im back at the start, but, thoughts?
Memberfish26
A.k.a.: benito
Fahrvergnugen
****


Avatar


Posts: 903
Threads: 38
Registered: July 13th, 2007
Member Is Offline

Location: sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Grey
Mood: Ken awesome

posted on August 14th, 2009 at 03:13 PM



If you gonna run the 1600 with Kads, drive it hard because you will need to get used to half throttle on a 1776, 69cw, 9.0cr, 86b, 1.4, good hand ported heads, 45 dells, 1 5/8 merged, good full flow oiling and dynamic balancing on all rotating parts, along with all the other goodies. If you want HP build it right, build it once, on the ragged edge and then tone it down for the street.
So many street engines out there built half assed and way too tame. IMO ;)




bitten by the bug..........several times
MemberCraig Torrens
A.k.a.: Craig Torrens
Scirocco Rare
6 times Australian, 7 times State Hillclimb Class Champion
*********


Avatar


Posts: 8040
Threads: 347
Registered: January 10th, 2003
Member Is Offline

Location: Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Time to go Salt lake racing, and actually achieve a result.

posted on August 14th, 2009 at 08:42 PM



Quote:
Originally posted by fish26
So many street engines out there built half assed and way too tame. IMO ;)


yeah I agree with you on this...........I have a 132hp 1916 in the ragtop and its fine on the street.

Screw as much out of them i say! :lol:




Membertrickysimon
A.k.a.: Simon Azzopardi
Custom Title Time!
100km/h is only 9 seconds away
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1473
Threads: 43
Registered: December 15th, 2007
Member Is Offline

Location: Wagga Wagga
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on August 14th, 2009 at 09:02 PM



Awww :sniffle:



http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii19/trickysimon/Beetle/sig.jpg
Membercolonel mustard
Son of Jim - Creator of Good
******


No Avatar


Posts: 2829
Threads: 51
Registered: February 27th, 2009
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Black

posted on August 14th, 2009 at 11:30 PM



Simon, your setup is going to be sweet. Jealous. It will rock! (untill you want more power and go for IDF's then blow it apart and want to go biggger bigger biggggger!!)

So pretty much... You have probs seen my for sale threads (go buy some stuff!!) - the reason for this is that I'm going to just keep on plodding with the 1600 and try and get the setup the way I want it. (for the 1776 swap... in the future..)

So for anything to happen engine/exhaust wise in my car, i have to have some rear body damage fixed.
So, while the engine is out, Machine flywheel and change gearbox mounts.
Install new clutch. Install maxi oil pump (with the filter, as above post)
Install Extended sump. Breather box. (looking at the CSP type from Classic....) Powder coat tinware (get a 36hp style fan shroud!)
Install kadrons! (from Rod P - scat linkage!!) new coil. chrome fire wall. Exhaust. bolt it together and hope its go go go!

its going to cost a bit... but all fun stuff. :)
Super Moderatormatberry
Super Moderator
Go hard or go home
*******

Rank Avatar

Avatar


Posts: 8114
Threads: 134
Registered: March 7th, 2006
Member Is Offline

Location: Cooroy Qld
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue
Mood: enjoying waving at all my Kombi buddies from my T3

posted on August 15th, 2009 at 09:53 AM



Quote:
Originally posted by Craig Torrens
Quote:
Originally posted by fish26
So many street engines out there built half assed and way too tame. IMO ;)


yeah I agree with you on this...........I have a 132hp 1916 in the ragtop and its fine on the street.

Screw as much out of them I say! :lol:

Have to agree here

Too easy to have a mismatched piece of crap as so many a/c vw engines seem to be built this way. Not to mention many of the home AND pro built jobs I've seen that can't even set up the nice hipo parts you talk of.

With the good fuel we have now (98) and cheap parts available, go wild when you finally decide on a combo :-)




Matt Berry Motorsports...air cooled advice, repairs and mods Ph 0408 704 662
OFF-ROAD,CIRCUIT,DRAG,STREET,ENDURANCE
http://i375.photobucket.com/albums/oo199/mattberry-photo/20032011354-2.jpg
Memberfish26
A.k.a.: benito
Fahrvergnugen
****


Avatar


Posts: 903
Threads: 38
Registered: July 13th, 2007
Member Is Offline

Location: sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Grey
Mood: Ken awesome

posted on August 15th, 2009 at 11:54 PM



Matt, you on the money re: good fuel and cheap parts, I'm thinking of building a street 1776 with some nice welded heads, FK87 cam, 12:1cr, 48IDF, running on E85.
Just gotta find a good box, Berg 5 is out of my price range. Maybe have to make a call to Mr Danger.




bitten by the bug..........several times
 Pages:  1  2


  Go To Top


Powered by GaiaBB, © 2011 The GaiaBB Group
(C) 2001-2024 Aussieveedubbers

[ Queries: 40 ] [ PHP: 4.0% - SQL: 96.0% ]