Board Logo
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
[ Total Views: 660 | Total Replies: 7 | Thread Id: 76549 ]
Author: Subject:  Making a square motor
Membersander288
Custom Title Time!
"Bolt-on Master"
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1404
Threads: 183
Registered: August 26th, 2008
Member Is Offline

Location: Norman Park, QLD
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: This is my bug. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.

posted on May 14th, 2009 at 03:36 PM
Making a square motor


I was browsing through an old holden brochure the other day and was reading how the old FE's etc had square motors, and I was thinking what a square motor would be like in a bug, as I know we tend to always be over-square with a small stroke and big bore,

For example how do people think a 77 bore x 76 stroke would run? is it even possible?

food for thought I thought




BMW R65 LS
1967 1300 Deluxe
Swing-axles FTW :!:

http://i1183.photobucket.com/albums/x463/sander19671988/4201806984_a2d051587f_o.jpg
MemberRISKYBUG
Seriously Crusin Dubber
**


Avatar


Posts: 187
Threads: 9
Registered: March 3rd, 2008
Member Is Offline

Location: URALLA
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: RISKY IS 1337

posted on May 14th, 2009 at 05:58 PM



i don't think that would be much good
there is a ratio of bore to stroke for a good donk
little pistons with that kind of stroke i dont think would be worth trying
Membersander288
Custom Title Time!
"Bolt-on Master"
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1404
Threads: 183
Registered: August 26th, 2008
Member Is Offline

Location: Norman Park, QLD
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: This is my bug. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.

posted on May 14th, 2009 at 09:19 PM



looking online actually I just found some motors with a similar combo, but I suppose there is a reason why this isn't done anymore

http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/album_page.php?pic_id=200551 
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/album_page.php?pic_id=329477 




BMW R65 LS
1967 1300 Deluxe
Swing-axles FTW :!:

http://i1183.photobucket.com/albums/x463/sander19671988/4201806984_a2d051587f_o.jpg
MembermnsKmobi
Wolfsburg Wizard
***


Avatar


Posts: 589
Threads: 27
Registered: August 27th, 2002
Member Is Offline

Location: Melbourne
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on May 15th, 2009 at 01:09 PM



Quote:
Originally posted by sander288
I was browsing through an old holden brochure the other day and was reading how the old FE's etc had square motors, and I was thinking what a square motor would be like in a bug, as I know we tend to always be over-square with a small stroke and big bore,

For example how do people think a 77 bore x 76 stroke would run? is it even possible?

food for thought I thought


small stroke and big bore is probably because it is easier to change the p & cs then the crank!
Membermac76
Learner Dubber
*


No Avatar


Posts: 12
Threads: 1
Registered: May 1st, 2009
Member Is Offline

Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )

posted on May 17th, 2009 at 02:25 PM



problem with going smaller with the p&c is you have to runn smaller valves which is no good for hp! square as in 94 X 94 is great but no room for a crank that big and the engine would be very wide with a decent rod ratio. I have been pondering building a 2ltr motor for hillclimbs using a oxyboxer case with 101.6mm p&c and a custom 62mm crank but you would need to rev the tits off , but it would be a great little combo with massive valves and heaps of hp potential. so what i am saying i believe over square is the way to go.
Membersander288
Custom Title Time!
"Bolt-on Master"
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1404
Threads: 183
Registered: August 26th, 2008
Member Is Offline

Location: Norman Park, QLD
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: This is my bug. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.

posted on May 17th, 2009 at 07:05 PM



I agree I just was putting it out there, over square always seems to produce the best results and is a bit easier, I remember a conversation with stan pobjoy about over square and stroking motors, which did take a couple of hours but the point was porsche have been making boxer motors for years and have stuck with an oversquare combo and it works best and is more reliable becasue of the smaller crank.
Cheers all!




BMW R65 LS
1967 1300 Deluxe
Swing-axles FTW :!:

http://i1183.photobucket.com/albums/x463/sander19671988/4201806984_a2d051587f_o.jpg
MemberCraig Torrens
A.k.a.: Craig Torrens
Scirocco Rare
6 times Australian, 7 times State Hillclimb Class Champion
*********


Avatar


Posts: 8040
Threads: 347
Registered: January 10th, 2003
Member Is Offline

Location: Sydney
Theme: UltimaBB Pro Blue ( Default )
Mood: Time to go Salt lake racing, and actually achieve a result.

posted on May 17th, 2009 at 09:22 PM



Quote:
Originally posted by mac76
oxyboxer case with 101.6mm p&c and a custom 62mm crank but you would need to rev the tits off , but it would be a great little combo with massive valves and heaps of hp potential. so what i am saying i believe over square is the way to go.


My combo that I'm doing at the moment is 66mm stroke x 103mm pistons.




Memberpsimitar
Son of Jim - Creator of Good
******


Avatar


Posts: 2506
Threads: 148
Registered: January 1st, 2009
Member Is Offline

Location: North East Melbourne, VIC
Theme: UltimaBB Psyche Blue

posted on May 18th, 2009 at 03:35 PM



if I remember correctly, a longer throw crank creates more torque but you need a big enough explosion to keep it running smooth so there's a limitation to the size of piston you can use.
They did this with the Sierra Cosworth and made the 2L into a 2.4L just by using a longer throw crank. Due to the turbo charging they could make sure the bang was big enough but didn't have to dial the PSI up by much to create a very lazy motor that pulled like a V8. Ended up being marketed at the caravaning brigade.:)




madness is in the eye of the beholder :yes:


  Go To Top


Powered by GaiaBB, © 2011 The GaiaBB Group
(C) 2001-2024 Aussieveedubbers

[ Queries: 40 ] [ PHP: 3.7% - SQL: 96.3% ]