phantom wrote:- rear seat space? I have 2 teenage daughters...how much room is in the back there?
- I assume (very) limited storage space?
- fuel economy?
- advice on the current engine alternatives would be appreciated.
Rear seat leg and head room space can be tight if the front seat passengers are tall. Any three door car is like this these days. If the kids are not yet fully grown, they should be right as long as they don't get car sick. If they do, this is not the best car for back seat driving - they can't open any windows.
I reckon your daughters will love the car. I never got so many questions about any car I've owned - perfect strangers will talk to you at the petrol stations and at car parks.
The non-Cabrios have reasonable storage space - it's about 1/2 the size of a Commodore boot and the rear seats fold down for those big loads. I never had any troubles but I am single and the cats don't pack any heat when they travel. The Cabrio has a pretty small boot which would be fine for me, but not sufficient for a family of four.
The most fuel efficient engine is the 1.6, followed by the 1.8t, followed in last place by the 2.slow. All of them require 95 or better fuel. You'll be looking around 8 l/100km for the 1.6, 8.2 l/100 km for the 1.8t (which was the lifetime average of my Turbo Beetle over two years, and I did not spare the horses). The 2.slow brings up the rear at around 8.5 l/100 km for the basic manual to 13 l/100 km for the Cabrio auto in the city. None of them are as thirsty as your Commodore and all of them do very well on long drives in the country.
I'd still suggest the 1.8t as it's more fuel efficient (and fun) than the 2.slow. If you find VW are selling you the new 2.5 I5 engine, you'll be happy with that, even if it uses more fuel than both the 2.slow and the 1.8t. The 2.slow has a oil drinking habit. If it drinks more than 1.5 l per 1000 km, VW will replace the engine, but if it "only" drinks 1.499 l per 1000 km, you'll have to continue feeding it as VW consider that "normal". Ultra fussy running in or just being really lucky can help reduce the oil habit to low levels, but this level of effort simply should not be required in modern engines.
Andrew