Skip to content
Aussieveedubbers

Swing-Axle drifting in the 50\'s

0 likes
Share Share on Facebook Share on X Share on Reddit

CAFFINEPUSHERMAN bandito di culo

1,609 posts · joined May 2005 ·

#503867
cool kraut power
A candy coloured clown they called the sandman tip toes through my room every night just to sprinkle stardust on my pillow go to sleep everything will be allright
1967 Type 3 square
1956 double door panel
1968 single cab kombi

pete wood 23 Windows of Awesome

6,828 posts · joined Jan 2004 ·

#505056
if you'd read it more closely you'd notice it said...
"Spring compensated, low pivot point swingaxle..."


You see there's nothing particularly wrong with swingaxle unless you don't allow for large changes in camber (ie from neg to pos mid corner) and high centering. The only reasons it's an issue is if it has a short radius (axle length), high pivot point and no way of limiting radical positive camber...like say in VWs. In fact, if IRS isn't set up properly it can do exactly the same things, it's just they happens to a lesser extent. Porsche, Mercedes and Renault and for that matter, formula Vee, all used swingaxle very successfully in the late 50s early 60s. Formula vee still use swingaxle and they are very fast little cars.

For instance, check out this Renault Alpine. It was one of the greatest rally cars of all time and it has a rear engibed swingaxle rear. In the first pic, airbourne it's as clear as day and at rest, look at the wheel tuck. Just like a dumped beetle. This car was an awesome performer. It's not about the whether it's swingaxle or not, it about how you set it up. 👍


[ Edited on 26-6-06 by pete wood ]

2 attachments · Log in to view

"stoopid is stronger than axles"
http://drivingnotpolishing.blogspot.com.au/