Baja Wes wrote:GeorgeL wrote:If we're supposed to be worried about the ill effects of a coolant pipe of dissimilar metal, how do the manufacturers get away with an entire radiator?
copper was very popular for the first 70 years of automotive use because it was relatively easy to manufacturer and was far more efficient than anything that could be make of steel or aluminium at the time. The galvanic disadvantage was relatively small, and they could get around it by isolating the radiator and using good anti-corrosion additives in the coolant.
One advantage of the relatively delicate copper radiators is that it if galvanic corrosion does occur, it's the thick engine block that corrodes, not the thin copper radiator core.
I think that you're pounding the nail in copper's coffin a bit prematurely! Although aluminum is becoming more common, copper still remains in regular use. Oddly, European manufacturers have embraced aluminum strongly, while Japanese manufacturers have not been so quick to switch.
Aluminum will never be as efficient as copper in transmitting heat. You canna' change the laws of physics! The only material with a higher conductivity than copper is silver, which is a bit pricey.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/tables/thrcn.html
Now, in some of my research on this topic, I ran across an "expert" who suggested that galvanic corrosion problems could be cured by grounding the heater core and radiator to the engine block! Seems to me that this is backwards, since galvanic corrosion needs an electrical return path to proceed! Isolation, not grounding, is the way to keep things from corroding.
🙂