sinecure Want another... :(
1,031 posts · joined Mar 2006 ·
I've been told caster shims may help. Am I on the right track?
Thanks,
Mick.
I live in my own little world, but it's okay, they know me here.
sinecure Want another... :(
1,031 posts · joined Mar 2006 ·
MickH Hairy Gutted Sloth
3,389 posts · joined Sep 2003 ·
VWCOOL 23 Windows of Awesome
5,158 posts · joined Jun 2003 ·
sinecure Want another... :(
1,031 posts · joined Mar 2006 ·
Very well, Mick. Interior stripped at the mo' for new carpet, console and dash.MickH wrote:Yep. Hows the beast going???
sinecure Want another... :(
1,031 posts · joined Mar 2006 ·
Unfortunately (sort of), I wouldn't want to raise it, as the body is really designed to sit this low (full, legal 125mm under car clearance), that's why I wanted dropped spindles. The only set available would cost me around $750 landed.VWCOOL wrote:The usual Beetle caster shims won't fit... But yes, more caster (ie: +3 or more deg) is good for steering feel and stability
Do you need it 'low'? You might be amazed at what an inch or two in extra ride height can do
[ Edited on 28-9-2007 by VWCOOL ]
VWCOOL 23 Windows of Awesome
5,158 posts · joined Jun 2003 ·
Joval Learner Dubber
19 posts · joined Aug 2007 ·
sinecure Want another... :(
1,031 posts · joined Mar 2006 ·
Yes, the design of the Purvis is easier, being based on the swing axle beetle chassis, with lowered floor pans to compensate for the roof height. Apparently, DRB used the type3 because their kits were so heavy (1300kg for mine, around 800kg for the Eureka).VWCOOL wrote:yes its a shame a lot of kit car bodies were designed for lowered chassis where it would have been far more sensible to produce a body with lowered wheelarches 😉
One inch raised might be all that is needed to get some caster back without looking 'raised'
Beetle shims fit between teh lower front axle tube and chassis; Type 3s have a full-circle rertainer but you may be able to re-engineer this section of the chassis to tilt the beam...?
You know Type 3s have some camber/caster adjustment at the top arm...?
sinecure Want another... :(
1,031 posts · joined Mar 2006 ·
I suspect bump steer has some degree of influence, but it does wander at speed on a dead flat surface (Mt Cotton driver training facility). Do you mean inverting the tie-rod ends where they attach to the spindle? Would this have a similar effect to 'lowered' BJ's?Joval wrote:Could it be down to bump steer? Inverting the tie-rods at the spindles should restore the angle, but you may need to get bushes made up.
VWCOOL 23 Windows of Awesome
5,158 posts · joined Jun 2003 ·
[ Edited on 1-10-2007 by VWCOOL ]sinecure wrote:Yes, the design of the Purvis is easier, being based on the swing axle beetle chassis, with lowered floor pans to compensate for the roof height. Apparently, DRB used the type3 because their kits were so heavy (1300kg for mine, around 800kg for the Eureka).VWCOOL wrote:yes its a shame a lot of kit car bodies were designed for lowered chassis where it would have been far more sensible to produce a body with lowered wheelarches 😉
One inch raised might be all that is needed to get some caster back without looking 'raised'
Beetle shims fit between teh lower front axle tube and chassis; Type 3s have a full-circle rertainer but you may be able to re-engineer this section of the chassis to tilt the beam...?
You know Type 3s have some camber/caster adjustment at the top arm...?
There is only about three inches between my bumpstop lugs (no bump stop rubbers were present when I got the car) and the landing surface for them. Factory bump stops only just fit at rest, so I'm making a new, lower set.
Isn't one 'notch' on the suspension around two inches? If I could raise by only an inch, I would be very happy with that. As far as tilting the beam, would this actully help as the car is not raked at all?
I've looked at the suspension adjustments in the manual and intended on having a fool around with them, I just wanted to make sure that there wasn't something relatively straightforward (like shims or dropped spindles) I could do to correct the geometry.
Thanks,
Mick.
sinecure Want another... :(
1,031 posts · joined Mar 2006 ·
Joval Learner Dubber
19 posts · joined Aug 2007 ·
Craig Torrens 6 times Australian, 7 times State Hillclimb Class Champion
8,040 posts · joined Jan 2003 ·
sinecure Want another... :(
1,031 posts · joined Mar 2006 ·
Thanks, Craig. This may be a stupid question, but by rotate do you mean invert?Craig Torrens wrote:Joval, all you need to do is rotate the steering box on the beam to bring the tierods back to a respectable angle.:thumb
Joval Learner Dubber
19 posts · joined Aug 2007 ·
68AutoBug Beetle Restorer - Experience over 138\% - YIKES --
11,654 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·
sinecure Want another... :(
1,031 posts · joined Mar 2006 ·