im looking at tuning my wrx on e85. Its currently tuned on 98 pulp.
It is already setup with bigger injectors, fuel pump, aftermarket ecu, & LC1 wideband sensor.
You will run lean if you dont tune for e85. It burns alot quicker, & you use about 30% more fuel than regular pulp.
I dont think i will try E85 in my type 3 though. I dont think the old fuel system could handle that much ethanol.
I have run E10 in the type 3 once, but i generally run 95 or 98 pulp in the vw.
Some positives from E85 fuel are that your motor will run cooler, you can run a few degress more ignition advance, & more boost in turbocharged engines. The higher octane means less chance of the engine knock. But you will use approx 30% more fuel.
On Monday night in Sydney E85 was $1.20 something a liter. 98 pulp was around $1.70 a liter. If you use approx 30% more fuel with E85, it ends up working out around the same price.
Im not looking at E85 fuel for a cost saving, but more from a increased performance point of view.
I bought 10 liters of E85 from the United servo in Rozelle Sydney the other night. Put in 10 liters of E85 mixed with 50 liters of 98 pulp.
I had the laptop with me to adjust the tune. I only adjusted the injector trims a little
to put more fuel in across the map.
Only very early days, but i plan to eventually have an 100% E85 map for the subaru.
I would still have a 98 pulp map, that i could use when i cant get E85.
below is a quote from a subaru forum, which has a really good thread on E85
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=803341
what is the ideal fuel air mixture for E85
If you are tuning with a wideband O2 sensor you will want to switch it to Lamda mode to get valid fuel air mixtures with blended fuels. If you can only get gasoline AFR's, simply divide the gasoline AFR's by 1.5 to get the true AFR for 100% E85. If running a partial mixture you can make proportional changes based on the percentage of E85 in the mix.
Here are some comparisions of stoichmetric fuel mixtures for different fuel blends:
======== stoichmetric AFR ===== max power rich AFR
Gasoline ---------- 14.7:1 -------------------12.5
100% E-85 ------- 9.73-9.8:1 ------------- ~ 9:1 - 8:1
100% fuel ethanol - 9:1 ------------------- ~ 7.2:1
One source specifies that the proper fuel tune (stoich) for a VW Golf running 22% ethanol was 12.7:1 (this reference was probably from the Brazil tests)
Ethanol reaches max torque at richer mixtures than gasoline will.
Using a 99% ethanol mixture MEP increases with mixtures up to 40% excess fuel where with gasoline MEP is reached near 20% excess fuel. Over all thermal effeciency for both gasoline and ethanol is reached near 15% excess fuel.
E85 burns faster than gasoline at best mixtures so it is an inherently more effecient fuel. It also produces more exhaust gas for a give weight of fuel air mix giving higher average cylinder pressures inspite of lower EGT's. With streight E85 in a properly tuned car its good for about +5% power / torque increase. I suspect on a turbocharged car the benefit is larger.
My source lists stoich for E85 as 9.8:1 ( "Burn rates and emissions from ethanol gasoline blends" )
http://www.engin.umd.umich.edu/resea...5-2004.doc.pdf
will a wide band O2 sensor accurately read fuel air mixtures with E85 blends ?
To get an accurate AFR reading you need to switch the meter to Lambda or equivalence ratio setting rather than AFR. Most O2 sensors assume you are running gasoline and will report a stoichimetric mixture as 14.7:1 which is the proper value for gasoline. E85 has a Stoichemetric mixture of between 9.7 - 10:1 and a max power mixture of about 6.98-8.5:1 or so, where with gasoline it is 12.5:1-to 13.1.
If you must use an O2 sensor that only reports gasoline AFR information simply divide the numbers it reports by 1.47 - 1.50.
On gasoline, my ECU is supposed to give a mixture of 11.5:1 and on 100% E85 the dyno's wide band reported an AFR of 11.6:1. That means that my true AFR on the E85 was about 7.8:1 which is right in the middle of max power mixtures for E85.