okay guys rod will be building me a 2054cc, 44idfs,cb oval ports 42x37.5 valves. im trying to decide on which cam to go for,the engle 120 with stock ratios or fk8 with 1.25's or 1.4 ratios.
could u give me your veiws between the two, how they will behave in the engine etc.
the car will be used as a second daily driver and will be raced accasionaly aswell.
all the advise will be great. dont have to much fun at warwick.
yeah go past the 120 with that combo (especially if your going ratio rockers)..........K8 is very usable on the street, still completely drivable "under" the cam.............
I have the 120 with 1.25's in ,my 2L. With wedge ports and 48's. It revs!!!, max power at the moment is redline of 7200rpm..... refer the dyno section for my specs and dyno curve.
I have no sympathy for my car, only the wallet that pays for it!
Go hard or go home!!!!
thanks guys.
is there any valve train issues with the k8 and ratios?
i was also looking at the scat c45, cb2288. whats your thoughts on these cams for my application??
Sounds like a nice combo however a lot of people under cam their engines to retain "drivebility".
Most 2L+ engines with good flowing heads and exhaust, healthy compression and dual carbs do not suffer from large cam effects as much as
bitten by the bug..........several times
WTF is going on with d forum, cut most of my reply &^%$# (*&&#@$.
2054cc k8/k10, 1:1.4 should be a blast, make it 2165cc fk87, 5.5 h beams, 9:1, a nice box with 1.04 4th and hold on. keep us posted.
bitten by the bug..........several times
i ran a c45 in a 2180 yrs ago, had trouble with overheating, not sure why this happened, but it didnt when i put in a fk87 with no other mods.
yeah damo definitliy to much choices. ive heard goods and bads about k8 with 1.4'sk.??
thanks guys.
