Skip to content
Aussieveedubbers

1916 Fuel Consumption?

0 likes
Share Share on Facebook Share on X Share on Reddit

mickmick Seriously Crusin Dubber

112 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·

#694173
Hi all, i've got a 68 beetle with a 1916 engine and twin Kadrons. After filling with 98 octane and driving around in not alot of traffic for about 180km my fuel consumption was 12.1 lt/100kms. Is this normal or a little high? What can i do to lower the thirst? As i've only just got it, could a service help?
Cheers
Now taking donations to help make a Beetle healthy again 😂

vw54 Administrator Always Waiting 4 Friday

16,723 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·

#694174
yeah that sounds about right I have similar engine with injection

depending on how i drive reflects the consumption

what gear box do you have a what final ratio
I read it on FACEBOOK so it must be true


http://forums.aussieveedubbers.com/viewtopic.php?tid=91278&page=1#pid848630


http://forums.aussieveedubbers.com/viewtopic.php?tid=63561&page=1#pid624099


http://forums.aussieveedubbers.com/viewtopic.php?tid=4832&page=1#pid452603


http://forums.aussieveedubbers.com/viewtopic.php?tid=60650&page=1#pid574409

mickmick Seriously Crusin Dubber

112 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·

#694178
No idea what gearbox and ratio i've got. We are going to use it as a daily driver and we do about 20-25 000km a year so the less it drinks the better. Apart from changing engines, is there anything that can be done to lower the fuel usage?
Now taking donations to help make a Beetle healthy again 😂

vw54 Administrator Always Waiting 4 Friday

16,723 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·

#694187
Probally fit electronic ignition and maybe platinium plugs so yr spark is always good and its burning the fuel efficientlyi

perhaps a less dense air filter might help

and of course less throttle pedal pressure will also help put a tennis ball under the pedal so its harder to push down

you need a 3.88 diff ratio this will drop your engine revs when cruising by 4 to 5 hundred revs again saving fuel when crusing

tyre pressure will also help make sure there up around 36lb all the time less drag
I read it on FACEBOOK so it must be true


http://forums.aussieveedubbers.com/viewtopic.php?tid=91278&page=1#pid848630


http://forums.aussieveedubbers.com/viewtopic.php?tid=63561&page=1#pid624099


http://forums.aussieveedubbers.com/viewtopic.php?tid=4832&page=1#pid452603


http://forums.aussieveedubbers.com/viewtopic.php?tid=60650&page=1#pid574409

Sides Veteran Volks Folk

2,220 posts · joined May 2007 ·

#694189
Twin carbs are great for power, but not exactly brilliant for economy.... bummer hey.

Running 98 is only worth it if the engine is tuned to match - try a couple of tanks of 95 and see if there's any noticeable difference.

Other than that, yeah - a tune up doing all the standard VW things like oil change, tappets, plugs, points, filters, mixtures etc. could help... clean air filters and having the mixtures right probably has the biggest potential.

Also back when I used to chase economy (as an impoverished student) I got small improvements through putting my bug on a diet - getting rid of all the unneeded crap that gets carted around in most VWs, ditching the back seat - stuff like that. Small improvement as in like 10's in traffic came down to mid 9's... still the best I ever got from my 1640 with twin kads was 482km on a single tank on a nice long drive.
VWDCQ vice pres & web dude - vwdcqinc.org.au
Join a car club - get car peeps

My toys
'70 Hillclimb Bug 'Jezebel' w/- Haltech EFI - http://bit.ly/VwTNtQ
'60 KG Coupe - resto kinda started
01 New Beetle - gf's car, but I turn the spanners

mickmick Seriously Crusin Dubber

112 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·

#694222
How much would electronic ignition cost in Sydney to get fitted and where is best?
I think it needs a service as it doesn't feel "right", maybe its the mixtures but i don't know anything about carbs or most engine things for that matter. Veedub Classic Volkswagen are the closest and Vintage vee dub Supplies are also in range. Does anyone recommend anyone for the service?
Now taking donations to help make a Beetle healthy again 😂

Craig Torrens 6 times Australian, 7 times State Hillclimb Class Champion

8,040 posts · joined Jan 2003 ·

#694312
about 8-9lt per 100K's.........giving it some stick!


mickmick Seriously Crusin Dubber

112 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·

#694351
Craig Torrens wrote:about 8-9lt per 100K's.........giving it some stick!
That would make me quite happy if i could achieve those kind of figures. What setup are you running?
Now taking donations to help make a Beetle healthy again 😂

Bizarre Moderator The artist formerly known as blue74l

12,785 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·

#694407
i get 12L/100 in commuting and about 8L/100 when cruising
Futue te ipsum!!!

mickmick Seriously Crusin Dubber

112 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·

#694628
The 12L/100 i got was pretty much cruising so i'm guessing its out of tune unless i've got a closer ratio gearbox or something like that. Is there a way to find out if gear box isn't standard?
Now taking donations to help make a Beetle healthy again 😂

mickmick Seriously Crusin Dubber

112 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·

#694636
Oh well, i hopefully will not find out for a long time then 😁
Now taking donations to help make a Beetle healthy again 😂

VWCOOL 23 Windows of Awesome

5,158 posts · joined Jun 2003 ·

#694654
you can't use terms like 'about' or 'usually' or 'a bit' when talking fuel consumption. You must be EXACT, distance and litres to do it.

I used to do Sydney/Canberra with my 1916: 350km on 35 litres. That's 10L/100kmh and with 3.5 hours door-to-door (including across Sydney) I certainly didn't drive for economy...!

Get your basic tune (plugs, points, lead, idle mixture, accel pump etc) perfect before you do any fuel measurements
Pay your debts, CxxT

Boozo Back in the bug

359 posts · joined Sep 2007 ·

#694661
yeah around 10-12 seems normal for every day comuting thats combined city and highway, having said that, mine is pretty mild, standard heads, about 65hp at the wheels, and i dont drive it gently.
On my run to valla in 2004 i managed around 7-8 /100 on the loooong highway run from the sunny coast. that was a slow run though as it was a cruise with plenty of kombi's and standard bugs to wait for.
'59 or Kombi?....feeling confused

'59 bug
'68 bug
'82 import T3 BUS. aircooled

vw54 Administrator Always Waiting 4 Friday

16,723 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·

#694835
about 8-9lt per 100K's.........giving it some stick!
Craig yr telling porkies again utter crap
I read it on FACEBOOK so it must be true


http://forums.aussieveedubbers.com/viewtopic.php?tid=91278&page=1#pid848630


http://forums.aussieveedubbers.com/viewtopic.php?tid=63561&page=1#pid624099


http://forums.aussieveedubbers.com/viewtopic.php?tid=4832&page=1#pid452603


http://forums.aussieveedubbers.com/viewtopic.php?tid=60650&page=1#pid574409

Craig Torrens 6 times Australian, 7 times State Hillclimb Class Champion

8,040 posts · joined Jan 2003 ·

#694873
vw54 wrote:
about 8-9lt per 100K's.........giving it some stick!
Craig yr telling porkies again utter crap

Take my car..........get it dynoed to see the HP, then drive it for a couple of tanks, then come back and confirm what it does................just cause you cant get it with your setup doesnt mean others cant.


Craig Torrens 6 times Australian, 7 times State Hillclimb Class Champion

8,040 posts · joined Jan 2003 ·

#694900
whatever dave.......you're the guru

the biggest problem most people have in getting good fuel economy is that they dont understand what revs their motor is the most fuel efficient. I know of plenty of people that drive around with performance cams in their motors but they change gears before the cam has even come in..........or they labour the motor up hills at lower revs with the foot flat to the floor instead of going back a gear.

I found that my 80-85 HP 1916 with 40mm Dels used more fuel than my 127hp 1916 with 44 idf's........found that interesting! (both motors were used in the same car, the dasdubber ragtop)


mickmick Seriously Crusin Dubber

112 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·

#694959
Craig Torrens wrote:
vw54 wrote:
about 8-9lt per 100K's.........giving it some stick!
Craig yr telling porkies again utter crap

Take my car..........get it dynoed to see the HP, then drive it for a couple of tanks, then come back and confirm what it does................just cause you cant get it with your setup doesnt mean others cant.
Ok Craig, i'll take your car for a spin for a few months if thats what you really want 😂
I'm getting a bit of rust cut out on Monday then i'll get the old girl serviced and see if that gets her a bit more efficient. I hope so.
Now taking donations to help make a Beetle healthy again 😂

TruebelieverVW Learner Dubber

13 posts · joined Apr 2005 ·

#695106
My 1916 cc L Bug with twin kadrons averages between 11 and 13 litres per 100km combined highway and city - driving sensibly. And that was after my mechanic put in smaller jets!!!

Will be getting electronic ignition at the next service and hopefully that will improve it a bit. Dream for 10 litres per 100km.

Boozo Back in the bug

359 posts · joined Sep 2007 ·

#695109
Craig Torrens wrote:whatever dave.......you're the guru

the biggest problem most people have in getting good fuel economy is that they dont understand what revs their motor is the most fuel efficient. I know of plenty of people that drive around with performance cams in their motors but they change gears before the cam has even come in..........or they labour the motor up hills at lower revs with the foot flat to the floor instead of going back a gear.

I found that my 80-85 HP 1916 with 40mm Dels used more fuel than my 127hp 1916 with 44 idf's........found that interesting! (both motors were used in the same car, the dasdubber ragtop)
well said craig, i see people labor their cars around all day long telling me that revs drink fuel. sounds like we have a very similar driving style 🙂
unless the cops are around then i tend to labor it along a little, its quiter than way.
'59 or Kombi?....feeling confused

'59 bug
'68 bug
'82 import T3 BUS. aircooled