annosL Officially Full-On Dubber
378 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·
annosL Officially Full-On Dubber
378 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·
annosL Officially Full-On Dubber
378 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·
Bizarre Moderator The artist formerly known as blue74l
12,789 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·
annosL Officially Full-On Dubber
378 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·
colonel mustard Son of Jim - Creator of Good
2,829 posts · joined Feb 2009 ·
annosL Officially Full-On Dubber
378 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·
RodPenrose Insano Dub Head
792 posts · joined Apr 2005 ·
squizy Thinking about another dub...maybe
4,082 posts · joined Dec 2002 ·
annosL Officially Full-On Dubber
378 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·
VWCOOL 23 Windows of Awesome
5,158 posts · joined Jun 2003 ·
Technically, that is correct as it is a 'change' to a vehicle's safety system. However, as inertias are an upgrade - and if they can be fitted to the standard unmodified anchorages - they are acceptable without engineers reportsquizy wrote:Because of the year of your bug, you can only legally install static belts. You will need engineering requirements and stengthening to run inertia reel. If anything, check with your local seatbelt installer / engineer, and they will ensure that they fit you a belt that is legal. Don't buy an inertia reel from the US until you know what it is that you can legally have.
grumble Son of Jim - Creator of Good
2,672 posts · joined Jun 2008 ·
VWCOOL wrote:Technically, that is correct as it is a 'change' to a vehicle's safety system. However, as inertias are an upgrade - and if they can be fitted to the standard unmodified anchorages - they are acceptable without engineers reportsquizy wrote:Because of the year of your bug, you can only legally install static belts. You will need engineering requirements and stengthening to run inertia reel. If anything, check with your local seatbelt installer / engineer, and they will ensure that they fit you a belt that is legal. Don't buy an inertia reel from the US until you know what it is that you can legally have.
Sorry to differ but that is not quite what the RTA rules say in regard to modifications as by changing from a static belt to an inertia belt the amount of load is multiplied at the upper mounting point .There was a formula in the Auvis training manual when I did my training.
This has been discussed in depth previous posts,but the final decision is yours.Cheers Les
But USA may not meet ADRs so buy local
squizy Thinking about another dub...maybe
4,082 posts · joined Dec 2002 ·
Correct. This was the point I was making. If you have an early bug, and you put inertia reels in it, and you have an accident, they may give way because of the extra load placed on the mounting point.grumble wrote:Sorry to differ but that is not quite what the RTA rules say in regard to modifications as by changing from a static belt to an inertia belt the amount of load is multiplied at the upper mounting point .There was a formula in the Auvis training manual when I did my training.
This has been discussed in depth previous posts,but the final decision is yours.Cheers Les
annosL Officially Full-On Dubber
378 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·
Joel Now containing 100\% E-Wang
9,368 posts · joined Feb 2006 ·
Flintstones Custom Title Time!
1,077 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·
zayus Wolfsburg Wizard
437 posts · joined Sep 2002 ·
annosL Officially Full-On Dubber
378 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·
1 attachment · Log in to view
annosL Officially Full-On Dubber
378 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·
rusty69911 Learner Dubber
15 posts · joined Jun 2009 ·
annosL Officially Full-On Dubber
378 posts · joined Dec 2008 ·
rusty69911 Learner Dubber
15 posts · joined Jun 2009 ·
jjwebb123 Wolfsburg Wizard
617 posts · joined Aug 2009 ·