65standard Officially Full-On Dubber
373 posts · joined Apr 2009 ·
It seems that engines after 1967 had the hardened valve seats and ULP/PULP is fine to use.
The engine in my car is a stock 1200. It appears to be the original to the car but I cannot confirm it. If it is, then it was built at the end of 1964 and my car Feb 1965.
My query is about the use of fuel additive (FlashLube to be precise) in 95 fuel. Up until a couple of months ago, my regular Caltex service station was selling standard 91 fuel. I was using FlashLube with no problems. Since then they have been using E10 fuel as the standard 91 fuel, and I inadvertently filled the tank one time with the E10 and used FlashLube as I regularly do. There was no real drop in engine performance (not that there's much to drop in a 1200), but the mileage wasn't there.
I have since been using Vortex 95 as my fuel and using the FlashLube. Performance has been good and mileage improved (around 28mpg for my daily trips to and from work in general traffic on Sydney streets).
I have pulled the plugs and there is heavy carbon deposit on them. I have adjusted the carb (28PICT) and timing as always as per specs 10 BTDC and valves at .006" I never had the plugs this black before (fuzzy, not oily). Could the higher octane fuel and fuel additive make the fuel mix too rich? Would it be safe to use the Vortex 95 fuel without the FlashLube?
As is the case, regular 91 fuel will be phased out by July 2011.
Any helpful insight would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Norman