Hanzelz Learner Dubber
4 posts · joined Jul 2011 ·
Are these vans worth much less than if it had a 1800 or 2 litre in it?
Hanzelz Learner Dubber
4 posts · joined Jul 2011 ·
Andy Andy\'s Adventures
2,820 posts · joined Nov 2002 ·
4kombiswilldo Casual Dubber
34 posts · joined Mar 2010 ·
helbus Administrator Mad fabricator, paint and body
7,386 posts · joined Sep 2002 ·
Andy Andy\'s Adventures
2,820 posts · joined Nov 2002 ·
helbus wrote:A big engine Type 4 engine (1700, 1800, 2lt) bus can have a Suby motor slip straight in with no cutting at all whatsover. Something that makes the big engine busses more desirable also.
I have a heavy right foot and like acceleration and cruising, so the 2lt would be my pick.
For fuel economy the 1800 with a 2lt box would be good. We had this setup originally and got 10lt/100 km easily on the highway.
baywindowbandit Seriously Crusin Dubber
126 posts · joined Jun 2007 ·
That's not the case is it? The later bays had a different valance where the tin wear sat higher on the left hand side.Andy wrote:Enginebay is the same regardless of the motor. The engine bay changed in '73 to allow the type 4 style motor to fit in. Both motors fit fine in the later bus's.
Joel Now containing 100\% E-Wang
9,368 posts · joined Feb 2006 ·
porrerahopeful Learner Dubber
10 posts · joined Sep 2011 ·