Skip to content
Aussieveedubbers

T4 advice

0 likes
Share Share on Facebook Share on X Share on Reddit

slugger95 Learner Dubber

15 posts · joined Jan 2006 ·

#620404
Hi guys, I am looking at buying a 1994 transporter(T4 I think??) with 270K on the clock. Looks honest enough at this stage just needs a tidy up. Manual box but has a leaky flange gasket by the sound of it. What should I be looking for and are they an expensive bus to fix?? He is asking 7k I am thinking more like 5 and a half K max.. Any info greatly appreciated.. Cheers Steve

crewcabconnection Being Sid James

1,922 posts · joined Apr 2003 ·

#620420
94 would be T4. Bear in mind that VWs, though more reliable than many, get old and tired. The price of parts often dont. Set of plug leads cost about $110, so you decide if thats a lot ... you get what you pay for. I'd buy a good T3 for 7k instead.
Loves a lolcat

Bizarre Moderator The artist formerly known as blue74l

12,789 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·

#620424
2L or 2.5L

Dont think i would buy a 2L in that situation
A good 2.5L might be a different situation though
Futue te ipsum!!!

Iwish4aSynchro Wolfsburg Wizard

639 posts · joined Aug 2006 ·

#620426
Buy a T3..
Stick to rear wheel drive.
Keep the steering and the propulsion seperate . Still a Kombi...

It's all good, until it's bad, i suppose

slugger95 Learner Dubber

15 posts · joined Jan 2006 ·

#620455
Thanks guys for all of the conmments etc

I was after the T4 for my business and wanted something that looked a little later model than the earlier T3. It is a 2.5 I think from memory as I think I recall seeing it embossed on the rocker cover. Is the flange gasket hard to change, I cant see how I could get to it???
Cheers

Steve

Golf Loon Casual Dubber

32 posts · joined Jul 2006 ·

#630946
I wouldnt be scared of the ks, they are great vans.

I reckon the 2L is heaps more reliable and cheaper to run and fix than the 2.5L. I see heaps of broken 5cylinder ones, but the 2Ls run forever.

h fractals - an ever changing lifestyle

7,671 posts · joined Feb 2005 ·

#630956
i have a 98 2.4D and havent had many probs.. although i only have low ks too..
how did you go?
fractal geometry; the inner most limits of mind altering abuse

Fantasy http://seventhchronicle.com

Z = Z2 + C1/r = 1/0 = infinity

Barrels www.barrelman.com.au

VW Workshop - aircooledgarage.com.au
allcooled.com.au

Golf Loon Casual Dubber

32 posts · joined Jul 2006 ·

#630960
Diesels are good and long lasting too, but more expensive.

The 5 cylinder petrol is the most delicate I reckon.

vwjon Fahrvergnugen

914 posts · joined Jul 2006 ·

#630977
the 2ltrs are under powered, the 2.5's are a great motor vry few probs, the ignition modual situated behind pass side headlight suffers from water / corrosion.

personally i'd go for a diesel, and i'd go for a 97on model, u can spot these by the vented drivers side wing/guard, they had suspension and trans upgrades. i'd also steer clear of auto's a manual is easier to repair- you wont need a computer!!
3 1959 cadillacs
1 musso
2 early notchbacks
2 split kombis
2 split panels
1 split ute
1 low light panel
1 ex-pmg bay
1 country buggy
1 beetle ute
1 14" syncro caravelle
1 16" syncro doka
1 golf cabrio
1 vw camper trailer
2 3meter bombs

Golf Loon Casual Dubber

32 posts · joined Jul 2006 ·

#631164
I dont agree that the 2.5L has few problems. I have seen a lot more major engine problems with those vans than with the 2Ls.

I tow a car trailer with a 2L and it has plenty of torque.