AUSSIE_MICK Officially Full-On Dubber
205 posts · joined Jan 2009 ·
Link:- https://leaders.myelectorate.com.au/crm/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u=131&qid=166926
AUSSIE_MICK Officially Full-On Dubber
205 posts · joined Jan 2009 ·
nsuwift Seriously Crusin Dubber
127 posts · joined Mar 2010 ·
1 attachment · Log in to view
SuperOwen Fahrvergnugen
868 posts · joined Jan 2009 ·
SuperOwen Fahrvergnugen
868 posts · joined Jan 2009 ·
There's a bit near the bottom about street rod's. Sounds like they are basically still covered by there own set of rules.nsuwift wrote:Think it will affect my dad's hot rod.
It's a 1937 hudson terraplane and is
considerably lower than standard.
original height
Craig S Wolfsburg Wizard
635 posts · joined May 2008 ·
nsuwift Seriously Crusin Dubber
127 posts · joined Mar 2010 ·
grogy Custom Title Time!
1,000 posts · joined Aug 2007 ·
vwjon Fahrvergnugen
914 posts · joined Jul 2006 ·
zocstar Officially Full-On Dubber
279 posts · joined May 2010 ·
cam070 Custom Title Time!
1,332 posts · joined Jul 2009 ·
How can they prove if your suspension was modified before or after it has been rego'ed? Will you have to provide receipts or something?zocstar wrote:It's not retrospective.
So if your car has been modified and then rego'd, it sounds like it's ok.
My apprentice was in a rush to get his airbaged hilux signed off on when they announced it, so it wouldn't affect him.
Have they passed this yet?? Or are we in the + 6 months??
waveman1500 Also rides a Honda
1,346 posts · joined Dec 2009 ·
A street rod is a special category of registration, with special rules detailed here: http://www.infrastructure.gov.au/roads/vehicle_regulation/bulletin/street_rod.aspxcam070 wrote:Also, what is the definition of a street rod?
SuperOwen Fahrvergnugen
868 posts · joined Jan 2009 ·
zocstar Officially Full-On Dubber
279 posts · joined May 2010 ·
Page 10, Yup that's what it says.cam070 wrote:How can they prove if your suspension was modified before or after it has been rego'ed? Will you have to provide receipts or something?
Also, what is the definition of a street rod?
Klaus Custom Title Time!
1,439 posts · joined Aug 2004 ·
1303Steve Scirocco Rare
8,650 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·
zocstar Officially Full-On Dubber
279 posts · joined May 2010 ·
Klaus Custom Title Time!
1,439 posts · joined Aug 2004 ·
Bizarre Moderator The artist formerly known as blue74l
12,789 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·
Not that I know ofSuperOwen wrote:Were drop spindles ever legal in nsw?
waveman1500 Also rides a Honda
1,346 posts · joined Dec 2009 ·
Change of height by changing tyres isn't included in that particular document, that's why they go to very careful lengths to define 'trim height'. Basically you're allowed 50mm by suspension drop without a report, or 150mm by suspension drop with a report, and then some other amount by tyre choice which is defined in a separate paper. I haven't read that one but the end result is that the minimum legal height is still 100mm.Klaus wrote:alot of business will be lost if it does pass , 6 inch drop is not much for a splitscreen bus , most of that is with the change of tyre
ian.mezz I never said, I could write or spell
3,913 posts · joined Sep 2004 ·
1303Steve Scirocco Rare
8,650 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·
ian.mezz I never said, I could write or spell
3,913 posts · joined Sep 2004 ·
1303Steve Scirocco Rare
8,650 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·
Special Air Service Chief "Gunna"
1,769 posts · joined Oct 2004 ·
The way I read it, is that adjuctable ride heights must not be able to be adjusted whilst the vehicle is mobile. Dumping it on the ground while staionary in a car park etc should be legal. Thats how I read it.1303Steve wrote:Hi
I guess that if the car has air bags fitted it must still comply with minimum height requirements of 100 mm, whether its driving or not.
Steve
ian.mezz I never said, I could write or spell
3,913 posts · joined Sep 2004 ·
yeah allegedly this car was park and the owner was at work,Special Air Service wrote:The way I read it, is that adjuctable ride heights must not be able to be adjusted whilst the vehicle is mobile. Dumping it on the ground while staionary in a car park etc should be legal. Thats how I read it.1303Steve wrote:Hi
I guess that if the car has air bags fitted it must still comply with minimum height requirements of 100 mm, whether its driving or not.
Steve
Which I think is the current regulation on that issue anyway.
Cheers
Brendan
bus914 Custom Title Time!
1,230 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·
squizy Thinking about another dub...maybe
4,082 posts · joined Dec 2002 ·
1 attachment · Log in to view
1303Steve Scirocco Rare
8,650 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·
Hibus914 wrote:A Type 3 is equipped with "variable height suspension control system" (aka splines) and so can be slammed to minimum clearance 😂 see point1, on page 4.
Also the "Ground clearance over peak in road" method is totally dependent on wheelbase. So a large car can not be as low to the ground as a much shorter vw.
Go the Type 3's.👍👍
1303Steve Scirocco Rare
8,650 posts · joined Aug 2002 ·
Hiian.mezz wrote:yeah allegedly this car was park and the owner was at work,Special Air Service wrote:The way I read it, is that adjuctable ride heights must not be able to be adjusted whilst the vehicle is mobile. Dumping it on the ground while staionary in a car park etc should be legal. Thats how I read it.1303Steve wrote:Hi
I guess that if the car has air bags fitted it must still comply with minimum height requirements of 100 mm, whether its driving or not.
Steve
Which I think is the current regulation on that issue anyway.
Cheers
Brendan
the young bloke come in late to day when we were leaving work to go home, He had to get the defect cleared and it was as easy for him to just push a button.🤪 and the car was 100mm 🤪
maybe we didnt get the whole story.
waveman1500 Also rides a Honda
1,346 posts · joined Dec 2009 ·